/r/WallStreetBets raids hedge funds with stock meme?

[Spurtacular]

grrrr we need to regulate big businesses and wall street more
but the party who actually pushes for those policies (and more specifically the left wing of that party, ie warren, sanders, etc)

Proactively shilling. OK.

[MultiTroll]

AMC moving forward?

13.16 after hours price at 5:00 PM EST

[Spurtacular]

AMC moving forward?

13.16 after hours price at 5:00 PM EST

I believe it'll go over 20. But if you're looking for short selling, I wouldn't take that to the bank.

[Adam Lambert]

I still woulda put in 10,000 dollars of change on friday tbqh. You gotta roll the dice ma nig

No, you don't have to roll the dice on a dead stock that's being propped up by memes. You can absolutely sit that one out.

[Adam Lambert]

Who says it was purposely bad? Brokerages (illegally) astroturfed it to bring it down. And this was done at the behest of the hedge fund managers. So, calling these tankers mere skimmers is BS.

What do you think the best-case scenario is for the growth of a GME stock priced at $350? Do you think it's enough to change lives for people who buy it at that price?

[hater]

No, you don't have to roll the dice on a dead stock that's being propped up by memes. You can absolutely sit that one out.

All stocks in stock market are hype. Wether its memes, or mainstream media, or whatever. Its all the sqme hype. Trust me I work in the business.

Its a house of cards, a puppet show.

[Spurtacular]

What do you think the best-case scenario is for the growth of a GME stock priced at $350? Do you think it's enough to change lives for people who buy it at that price?

Best case scenario is it goes over a thousand based on how leveraged it is. You're not buying it based on the company's balance sheet.

[Adam Lambert]

Best case scenario is it goes over a thousand based on how leveraged it is. You're not buying it based on the company's balance sheet.

Great. So if you're a 25 year old redditor, how much GME stock do you have to buy for a ~200% increase to substantially change your lifestyle or financial situation?

[Spurtacular]

Great. So if you're a 25 year old redditor, how much GME stock do you have to buy for a ~200% increase to substantially change your lifestyle or financial situation?

I'm not advising on buying it. You asked best case scenario.
Frankly, I think it's a very high risk investment at this point.

[spurraider21]

Who says it was purposely bad? Brokerages (illegally) astroturfed it to bring it down. And this was done at the behest of the hedge fund managers. So, calling these tankers mere skimmers is BS.

what was illegally done?

[Spurtacular]

what was illegally done?

Market manipulation at the behest of big ins utions.

Don't worry, Lite. Your people are not going to get indicted by Dictator Biden's minions. You can go back to shilling.

[spurraider21]

Market manipulation at the behest of big ins utions.

Don't worry, Lite. Your people are not going to get indicted by Dictator Biden's minions. You can go back to shilling.

how was the market illegally manipulated?

[Spurtacular]

how was the market illegally manipulated?

Is it your contention that no illegality has occurred?

[spurraider21]

Is it your contention that no illegality has occurred?

derp folds

my contention is that i dont think anything illegal has been demonstrated yet. i have no issue with the SEC investigating to make sure that was the case, though

now answer my question, or fold again:

how was the market illegally manipulated?

[ChumpDumper]

how was the market illegally manipulated?

PARENTHETICALLY

[Spurtacular]

derp folds

my contention is that i dont think anything illegal has been demonstrated yet. i have no issue with the SEC investigating to make sure that was the case, though

now answer my question, or fold again:

how was the market illegally manipulated?

Yea, those frantic phone calls from Citadel to Robinhood must've been legit.
Robinhood surely had a legal reason to shut down stocks for their benefit.

Let me know if you need the blue font.

[Adam Lambert]

I'm not advising on buying it. You asked best case scenario.
Frankly, I think it's a very high risk investment at this point.

We're not talking about your advice, we're talking about the people who are advising on buying it. The ones you jumped in to defend. Glad you agree it's indefensible to advise people to buy this stock to make easy money.

[Spurtacular]

We're not talking about your advice, we're talking about the people who are advising on buying it. The ones you jumped in to defend. Glad you agree it's indefensible to advise people to buy this stock to make easy money.

I don't think it's indefensible in and of itself. We live in America. Free speech is foundational.
Sounds like you got burned on the advice. My condolences.

[spurraider21]

Yea, those frantic phone calls from Citadel to Robinhood must've been legit.
Robinhood surely had a legal reason to shut down stocks for their benefit.

Let me know if you need the blue font.

i dont need any font.

im just asking you to articulate your claims like a normal person. how was the market illegally manipulated?

can you answer the question, or do you need to circle back to me later?

[Spurtacular]

i dont need any font.

im just asking you to articulate your claims like a normal person. how was the market illegally manipulated?

can you answer the question, or do you need to circle back to me later?

Do you think that shutting down the sale of stocks for the benefit of ins utions and their short orders is legal?

[spurraider21]

Do you think that shutting down the sale of stocks for the benefit of ins utions and their short orders is legal?

you are incapable of answering a question without a question. despite that, i have given you the courtesy of answering your last question.

how was the market illegally manipulated?

[Spurtacular]

you are incapable of answering a question without a question. despite that, i have given you the courtesy of answering your last question.

how was the market illegally manipulated?

You don't want to answer the question because you know that is surely illegal. Rather you want to stick with your endgame: tedium.

[ChumpDumper]

You don't want to answer the question because you know that is surely illegal. Rather you want to stick with your endgame: tedium.

everyone knows you're folding, derp.

[spurraider21]

You don't want to answer the question because you know that is surely illegal. Rather you want to stick with your endgame: tedium.

yes, what you described certainly sounds like its illegal. my issue is that i dont think it can be demonstrated at this point that it's the case. thats why your question ins meaningless.

it would be like if i accused trump of being a criminal, and then when you ask me for evidence, i say "well wouldnt it be illegal if trump shot somebody in the face?" the question is meaningless

now, i've answered a second question of yours even though you've failed to answer mine, so i'll ask again.

how was the market illegally manipulated?

[Spurtacular]

yes, what you described certainly sounds like its illegal. my issue is that i dont think it can be demonstrated at this point that it's the case. thats why your question ins meaningless.

it would be like if i accused trump of murder, and then when you ask me for evidence, i say "well wouldnt it be illegal if trump shot shomebody in the face?" the question is meaningless

now, i've answered a second question of yours even though you've failed to answer mine, so i'll ask again.

how was the market illegally manipulated?

You mean Peter Strzok's wife won't get to the bottom of it even if there are whistleblowers? I agree, tbh.