Reply With Quote
Planes flying in the 70s at approach speeds after dumping their fuel.
as an interesting side note about the burning jet fuel, i was watching one of those "most extreme video" shows and an 18 wheeler carrying jet fuel crashed into the base of a steel bridge. the voice over says "jet fuel burns at ___" i dont remember the number but it was pretty high. anyways, the bridge, after about 15 minutes, collapsed.
the melting point of steel is really high, but the point at which steel fails (ie loses half its strength) is actually pretty low. i learned that in a freshman material science engineering classes. jesus people, stop trying to manufacture something
the WTC was designed in the 70s to be safe from the planes flying in the 70s
Planes flying in the 70s at approach speeds after dumping their fuel.
Chump Dumper give it a rest and try to find out what really happened to Anna!
Silverstein hit her with a cruise missle.
This Chump Dumper guy is making chumps out of all of you
Has Mouse answered Chump's question yet?
I thought so . . .
I still can't believe that these guys have absolutely no opnion about what they think actually happened that day.
thats what I call theories
What's your theory?
Chicken
I think there were explosives and/or thermite in the building, i dont know who put them there, the floors didnt stack up on top of one other, you can see a yellow white liquid coming out of the towers, its not molten steel, its not molten aluminum, its not office materials, they removed all the steel and destroyed the evidence within two weeks. Flight 93 is a complete mystery because there were no bodies and if you look at the pictures of the crash site, its unlike any plane crash ive ever seen, it looks like they dumped trash in a big hole. Flight 93 was also reported to have landed in cleveland ohio
mookie is going to be the star of the upcoming CBS hit CSI: Victoria.
I think varying combinations of fire and structural damage caused the collapse of the WTC buildings.I think there were explosives and/or thermite in the buildingThere were plenty of body parts which were used for identification.Flight 93 is a complete mystery because there were no bodiesIt was confused with an AA jet that did land there.Flight 93 was also reported to have landed in cleveland ohio
You know in like 2011, mookie, Nbadan, mouse, and turambar's dog are going to corner Osama bin Laden in a subway tunnel somewhere, and mookie is going to pull Osama's mask off, and it will be Ken Lay underneath, and he'll say, "And I would have gotten away with it if it hadn't been for you meddling kids!"
You know, if I thought the government was behind all this, I'd be doing alot more than just putting bad voiceovers and cheesy ambient music to old news clips on the internets.
If I really thought the government was behind it, I would be involved in some kind of resistance.
Something besides posting YouTube links?
It's really very brave of them. They are risking... um...
what government are yall ing talking about?, I didnt say anything about any government
I love how this thread is the only thing going on in the political forum right now...it's the 90 year old man driving 15mph on a single lane highway.
its 18 pages because the case is so simple and open and shut
As for the WTC I think the planes crashing into the buildings carried reactants that combined with materials already planted the buildings (forgot the names) that instantly reacted to melt through the steel, making the buildings collapsed.
I think the building 7 was a blatant controlled demolition.
So what are you saying?
yall automatically jump to the fact that i think it was our government, just like yall I dont know who it was
I think the structural damage caused by the impact and the fires fueled by jet fuel and insulation and other combustables weakened the steel enough to cause a collapse.I think debris from the north tower collapse caused major structural damage and fires in WTC 7. Those fires were fueled in part by thousands of gallons of diesel fuel that circulated throughout the building. Explosions could have occured when storage tanks or supply lines ignited or electric transformers blew. The fire and the debris damage and explosions were enough to bring WTC 7 down, especially if the truss system over the ConEd substation was damaged.I think the building 7 was a blatant controlled demolition.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
