Reply With Quote
Booster up Pavs
get two
oh look, another conspiracy theory
Booster up Pavs
get two
I hope she boosters her way 6ft under.
What's your vaccine conspiracy theory?
Try to be a man and explain yourself.
COVID vaccines protect against heart attack and stroke
https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/...19-vaccinationThe study, published today in Nature Communications, showed that the incidence of arterial thromboses, such as heart attacks and strokes, was up to 10% lower in the 13 to 24 weeks after the first dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. Following a second dose, the incidence was up to 27% lower after receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine and up to 20% lower after the Pfizer/Biotech vaccine.
The incidence of common venous thrombotic events – mainly pulmonary embolism and lower limb deep venous thrombosis – followed a similar pattern.
Research led by the Universities of Cambridge, Bristol and Edinburgh and enabled by the British Heart Foundation (BHF) Data Science Centre at Health Data Research UK analysed de-identified health records from 46 million adults in England between 8 December 2020 and 23 January 2022. Data scientists compared the incidence of cardiovascular diseases after vaccination with the incidence before or without vaccination, during the first two years of the vaccination programme.
...while COVID itself appears to increase the incidence of heart disease and thrombotic events
https://edition.cnn.com/2024/10/09/h...ck-stroke-riskCovid-19 could be a powerful risk factor for heart attacks and strokes for as long as three years after an infection, a large new study suggests.
The study was published Wednesday in the medical journal Atherosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. It relied on medical records from roughly a quarter of a million people who were enrolled in a large database called the UK Biobank.
Within this dataset, researchers identified more than 11,000 people who had a positive lab test for Covid-19 do ented in their medical records in 2020; nearly 3,000 of them had been hospitalized for their infections. They compared these groups with more than 222,000 others in the same database who didn’t have a history of Covid-19 over the same time frame.
People who caught Covid in 2020, before there were vaccines to blunt the infection, had twice the risk of a major cardiac event like a heart attack or stroke or death for almost three years after their illness, compared with the people who didn’t test positive, the study found.
If a person had been hospitalized for their infection, pointing to a more severe case, the risk of a major heart event in was even greater – more than three times higher – than for people without Covid in their medical records.
What’s more, for people who needed to be hospitalized, Covid appeared to be as potent a risk factor for future heart attacks and strokes as diabetes or peripheral artery disease, or PAD.
COVID appears to cause immune deficiency that persists for at least 20 months post infection
https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...01971225005090Results
During mass infection, T cells, CD4+T cells, CD8+T cells, NK cells, and B cells dropped significantly. Even 20 months post-infection, CD8+ T cells remained 9.9% below baseline. Baseline lymphocyte subsets differed significantly by sex and age. Immune recovery varied by age and sex, with older adults and males showing prolonged lymphopenia. In cardiovascular disease patients, T lymphocytes remained 72.9% below baseline for 20 months post-infection.
Conclusions
Our findings redefine SARS-CoV-2 infection as a condition of long-lasting immune compromise. The sustained subnormal lymphocytes—particularly in cardiovascular disease cohorts—highlight a key immunologic feature of long COVID and underscore the need for personalized care.
Another obviously flawed study, which is even pointed out in the article. There's nothing magical about covid vaccines despite your addiction to them.
all studies have limitations, I never said vaccines are magical
you're too poisoned to perceive the trend of empirical evidence that vaccines do little harm and a lot of good
https://reason.com/2025/12/05/french...ase-in-deaths/A huge new French study in the Journal of the American Medical Association Network deflates those claims and confirms the safety and efficacy of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. The researchers followed 22.7 million vaccinated individuals and 5.9 million unvaccinated individuals for nearly four years. They found not only that vaccinated people have a 74 percent lower risk of death from severe COVID-19, but also that those individuals have a lower risk of death, period. Specifically, people who received the shots have a 25 percent lower risk of all-cause mortality.
JAMA Network (Zureik et al., JAMA Network)
As for the turbo-cancer claims, the researchers report that the incidence of tumors among vaccinated adults is 769 per million. For the unvaccinated, the rate is versus 853 per million. In other words, vaccinated adults were about 15 percent less likely to be diagnosed with cancer than those were unvaccinated.
The researchers sought to control for various confounders, such as a healthy-vaccinee effect, where healthier individuals are more likely to opt for vaccination, or a frailty-related bias, where those in poorer health may avoid it. They also note that vaccinated individuals in their study were generally older and tended to have more co-morbidities, such as obesity and chronic illnesses, which would usually be associated with an increased risk of dying. (The different results, they note, might be partially explained by the fact that vaccinated individuals tend to be more socioeconomically advantaged.)
"This study helps to put an end to the misinformation spread about mRNA vaccines," the study's lead author, Mahmoud Zureik, told Le Monde. "Providing data on the absence of long-term risks helps strengthen confidence in these vaccines, which will be developed for other viruses and diseases."
if the policy exposes Americans to otherwise avoidable harm and death, Republicans are for it
https://www.statnews.com/2025/12/03/...accine-policy/
Former Dem officials wrote a letter defending the status quo...cool
y'all are destroying public health in the US, the status quo ante was better
Do you personally think all those children died because of COVID-19 vaccinations?
Yes or no.
you guys are the status quo, tbh
too bad the Great Barrington Declaration assholes are in charge now
https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...568?via%3DihubHighlights
We conducted a territory-wide observational study of 1,737,475 adults in Hong Kong during the BA.4/5-dominant period (November 2022–January 2023). The Andersen-Gill model was employed to assess infection risks across different vaccination and infection history cohorts, comparing logous versus heterologous boosting strategies, bivalent versus standard vaccines, and vaccination-first versus infection-first approaches.
Cry harder. They were right.
Are you still on the wet market theory?
I'm not doctrinaire
why do you think they were right?
the trend of empirical study seems not to back you up
is 1,700,000 people not a robust enough cohort?
Where did covid come from, wh?
Do you still admire Fauci?
Darrin still doesn't care about the mass deaths because he was ok.
I don't care about Fauci one way or another. Respect the public service, but admire is way too strong a word.
why don't you answer your own question and make your own point?
I'm not a mindreader
I think bioengineering deadly viruses is a terrible idea
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
