^![]()
Did 82game.com suggest trading Wally for Jefferson this summer?
Did 82games say Anthony Randolph has reached his potential at age 19?
Not at all. 82 Games suggests that LeBron played ALOT more games at the 4 position than just 2 games you said.
Do you admit you were wrong about LeBron playing only 2 games at Power Forward?
It depends what the rest of the east can pull, if the Magic can get a real 4 and move Lewis to the 3 then they're going to be beasty.
Also you have to take into account that Howard will only be getting better, whereas Shaq is on the decline.
LeBron does play some power forward, in small ball line-ups and against teams that feature those types of line-ups (a combo forward or converted small forward at the PF position) like Orlando or the old Phoenix teams. That doesn't make him a power forward. And it's important to note that while LeBron did play some minutes at PF, not one game in the playoffs did he start at PF, not one regular season game did LeBron start at PF. Darnell Jackson and Lorenzen Wright even started games for the Cavs so LeBron wouldn't start at PF.
Most teams in the NBA now employ small ball line-ups. So, it's good to do the same to match up. But, against the best teams in the league, you don't want LeBron playing PF and having to defend the post against guys like KG or Gasol or Duncan. LeBron is big and strong and athletic, but he doesn't match-up well defensively against the best power forwards in the league and most of the great teams in the league employ a traditional line-up with a true PF and a true C, even if they also use small ball line-ups.
LeBron and Richard Jefferson would be useful against a team like the Orlando Magic last year. But, once they match up against Boston or the Lakers, what do they do?
this applies
I asked a simple question "Doesn't LeBron play Power Forward for the Cavs?" The answer was yes, in "only 2 games verus the Magic"
http://www.82games.com/0809/0809CLE2.HTM
Alot of Small Ball in the East. LeBron with RJ would work.
But the point is the Cavs could have gotten alot more with $20 million than just Shaq. Spurs got Richard Jefferson for trash and only spent $13 million in salary.
it's not a longer term solution to have Lebron playing PF
You know, you're disappointing like your boy Dirk4MVP. You'd rather be stupid than admit you're wrong. People thought you were just a troll but I didn't...now I see why they said it.
Enjoy talking with yourself.
So if the Cavs trade for Jefferson and Gordon they have.
Mo
Gordon
Jefferson
James
Z?
That team would get skull ed by any team with decent bigs.
Admit I'm wrong? I watched every minute of every Cavs game and Wally was the PF for a bunch of games, and Lebron was not. Even the other Cavs fan on here agrees with me. Your website is wrong man, I'm sorry to break it to you but sometimes the internet is not always right
Great move for the Cavs. I dont see how you can say how this is a bad move for them. They got shaq for nothing. Worse case if Shaq cant stay healthy, his contract ends this summer. Shaq isnt done yet. Now if they can get another guard and move West to backup role, they will be set to join the elite class.
Your question was based on your suggestion that the Cavs could have gotten Richard Jefferson. The way you barked back insults to make your point is the reason why people started flaming you. It's true LeBron has played minutes at PF. That is not enough to support a suggestion that Richard Jefferson would have been a better trade for the Cavaliers, especially since LeBron's best and most natural position is small forward, as it is for RJ.
LeBron and RJ doesn't make them more of a le contender than LeBron and Shaq. RJ might be the better player than Shaq at this point in their respective careers, but he wouldn't solve the Cavs problems either. They would still need help in the front court to match-up against KG and Dwight Howard. The best teams in the league have true centers and elite PFs.
Your point is still predicated on conjecture and an argument you cannot prove.
That team with the Decent Bigs would be the Lakers and the Magic and the Celtics. And the Cavs are still skull ed against the Lakers and Magic and Celtics with this Shaq trade.
I don't know about y'all, but IMHO this takes the Cavs up a BIG notch in the East.
You are a master jinxer Tampa. Any team you hype up is cursed.![]()
Where did I start barking back insults to make my point? I was flamed prior to my making ANY insults, you should know that by now. If you want to act like an asshole, I'll always go along with it, but I don't start it. Never have.
That's right RJ wouldn't have made them more of a contender. But the Cavs would have had $7 million left to make another trade for a quality player.LeBron and RJ doesn't make them more of a le contender than LeBron and Shaq. RJ might be the better player than Shaq at this point in their respective careers, but he wouldn't solve the Cavs problems either. They would still need help in the front court to match-up against KG and Dwight Howard. The best teams in the league have true centers and elite PFs.
yeah shaq´s slow, im´not sure if ben wallace was equivilent to the speed of sound either, lol
It's a gift...I know...![]()
Shaq will have to take back the "Kobe is better than Lebron" statement.
Good move by Cleveland.
Not by 2010...
New York Knicks have $18 million in the books for 2010.
Cleveland is in the books for $36 million in 2010.
................![]()
I'm not one of the people who flamed you so slow your role. I answered your question without flaming. I'm just saying the way you come across often invites the responses you get.
Again, you make a suggestion that cannot be supported. Who were the Cavs going to get by trading Sasha Pavlovic's $4.9 million salary? Would it really have been a quality player? Are there teams desperately waiting in line to try to help out the Cavaliers keep LeBron James? Please let me know.That's right RJ wouldn't have made them more of a contender. But the Cavs would have had $7 million left to make another trade for a quality player.
So you are saying 82 Games and ESPN are wrong and you are right. That's all I wanted to know.
ESPN: "seven of the Cavs' most-used lineups feature LBJ at the 4"
http://www.82games.com/0809/0809CLE2.HTM
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)