Reply With Quote
Never mind, i'll look it up
i'm positive that you would care.If I were gay, I wouldn't care about what Mr. Cathy says, and would enjoy his tasty nuggets
Never mind, i'll look it up
Oh, I see... the usual sexuals and child abusers strawman... carry on!
Ummm, not sure why you think you'd know that, but ok
and Human-Americans have the right to see anybody's IRS forms? Seems not to be true in Gecko's case.
feel better?
Who you calling a child abuser????? They WANTED to marry him!
which one is crookskanks?
Sorry, not familiar with the monster. Just did a quick google search and this is what it said:
Who you calling a child abuser????? They WANTED to marry him!
Warren Steed Jeffs is the president of the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. In 2011, Jeffs was convicted of two felony counts of child sexual assault.
I swear I have an inbred East Texas cousin that could easily be photoshoped into that picture and no one would ever notice any difference.
I swear I have an inbred East Texas cousin that could easily be photoshoped into that picture and no one would ever notice any difference.
Still not a good analogy because you are still talking about discrimination based on someone's genetics and not a behaviour/choice as with gays. Maybe a better analogy is an employer denying coverage to a spouse who is catholic, muslim, whatever.
I don't know that it is. This issue is just the one getting media attention everywhere. Recently, Major League Soccer ending their relationship with the Boy Scouts due to their views. Thats a pretty damn big decision to make and I didn't see any attention given to it outside the soccer community. Then again Chic Fil A might be a bigger company. I really have no idea. I guess my point is the Boy Scounts aren't being ignored.
looks like an older version of Ben Quayle tbh
Sexual preferences and differences should DEFINITELY be a protected class!
dudes get poked in the ass when they were growing up, then grow up to be s.....and expect the rest of us to endure their ness like we owe it to them. 'em.
being is not normal and you s will never convince me otherwise. your asshole is for defecating, not ing. sorry!
Obama 2012.
1) It is arguable whether being gay is a choice
2) Isn't being Catholic, Muslim, whatever a choice? It certainly isn't more genetic than being gay is.
there is less than 1% of people born with genetic confusion. the rest were sanduskized.
1.) Not really, there is no real evidence of it being genetic.
2.) Yes, that was the point of trying to provide a better analogy rather than the standard blacks = gays analogy.
Not to completely spin this thread off topic, but I read the nice write-up in SABJ today on craft brewing in SA. Do you happen to know those two brothers that are building that brewery/restaurant in that old house by the old Pearl brewry?
Lack of evidence isn't indisputable proof. So it's certainly arguable until further notice.
But it's still irrelevant, since there's plenty of protected classes that have nothing to do with genetics, including: Religion, National Origin, Age, Disability, Veteran Status, etc.
As a matter of fact, discrimination over genetic information is a protected class.
are we bordering on the conclusion that being gay is a choice?
smh
SnakeBoy can be into guys any time he chooses.
I don't know them, but have heard about their project. Sounds cool.
You mean all you guys don't just hang out in Austin lobbying together?
Is that report you wrote published? I'd be interested in reading it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
