Reply With Quote
It's too bad NDC has destroyed his trade value by sucking so hard.
Well one thing to keep in mind is that when it was announced that Ellis signed with a new agent, a few hours later he signed with the Mavs. So we will see...
It's too bad NDC has destroyed his trade value by sucking so hard.
Good ole off-season at ST
I think that was about the Trayvon Martin case and verdict.
One "Washington Wizards writer" thinks that Seraphin may be the player that is involved in the possible S/T.
http://www.rantsports.com/nba/2013/0...evin-seraphin/
Interesting..
The AK thread that speculated no deal reached like 25 pages before he signed with Brooklyn.
i hope its for seraphin. i wouldnt mind singleton or vesely. ariza wouldnt be horrible. but id rather see them aquire somebody who can play small ball big.
Please find a way to include decolo in the trade.
That's what player development people do, genius. Sean has a roster to fill with scrubs in November.
If Spurs get Seraphin thatd be amazing...
truth bomb
Well he's got an agent so I've got my fingers crossed.
Stop with the dramatization already. Nobody expected him to be a world beater. Houston signed him because of youth, potential and his production in LAL. It was a contract year for Ariza and Houston took a gamble and it didn't pay off like they had hoped. However, he was hardly. Bust. He's only had one real consistently good year, that being in LA, for his career. If you had higher expectations, then that's on you but nobody thought much of him when he entered the league and most people in the know were shocked that Houston offered up that kind of money to a glorified role player.. Heck, he was traded 4 times before landing his deal with the Rockets which should hep to clue you in to the type of player he was.
Not San Antonio.
Salaries have to match and a future draft pick counts as $0 dollars. I'm also inclined to think the Spurs are more apt to keep their futures with rebuilding right around the corner unless some organization offers them up a deal they can't refuse. Any deal involving Ariza would almost certainly have to include Bonner, and like I said before, Bonner is untradeable.
Then you missed Wojo's tweet about how it's unclear whether the Spurs are interested in anything Washington has to offer. Furthermore, the majority of teams in the league could use a stretch four but that doesn't mean they need/want Bonner. It's not a coincidence that Bonner's minutes have plummeted in each of the last three seasons. If you open your eyes, you'd see what the rest of the league sees and have realized for quite some time, he isn't very good at his job. And if he were, the Spurs wouldn't need to pursue players like Baynes and Pendergragh as rotational replacements. Bonner is playing out his final season as a Spur. If the Spurs do manage to find a suitable trade partner, it will most likely be at the trade deadline when teams only have to pay a portion of his 4M owed.
I like Blair but thinks he's a ticking time bomb. It's only speculation as too how much interest the Wizards actually have and what they're willing to offer up so we'll have to wait and see. But what I can tell you is that from every article I've read, none of them had Washington interested in Bonner. While I may sell a little high on Ariza as a role player and a backup to Kawhi, the value you're placing on Bonner is flat out laughable.
.... Now back to my vacation.
The whole of your post is just flat-out dumb, but this part takes the cake:
The Spurs certainly do have that $7 Million in expirings. They can certainly offer those and a first for Ariza, which is the best that any team will do at the deadline. Unless you're insinuating that the Spurs aren't a contender, it's incredibly clear that you fundamentally don't understand any of this. You just want to argue. No wonder people say you haven't had a good take on this board.
So the Wizards need to do a S&T or they can just sign him??
they are very close to the tax
Yep. Booker and Ariza are the names being tossed around right now, but the Spurs don't want Booker.
To a minimum deal, yeah. They'd have to use a S&T to give him anything more, though.
Maybe De Colo's good game gave some team the confidence they needed to work out a trade.
So we are possibly looking at sending Blair and Nando to the wizards?
I just don't know - doesn't it seem likely Blair will get only a min offer? Despite his production/advanced numbers warranting more, he has a lot of flaws and injury risks (although, nothing to date suggests any actual injury risks).
they are 2 million from tax
I think he'll get more than that, but not by much. If a S&T happened, I'd think Blair's deal would be something like $9M/3 with the last two years completely non-guaranteed.
If they were going offer him a min. deal, he would probably be a Wiz already.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
