How many times today are you going to let me go
translation
Hey Avante, how about Gene Washington the first stud Viking receiver?
Ok.
Washington was a 13.7 hurdler while at Michigan State, a tall fluid guy with a stride. He was howver pretty much a fly pattern receiver, sorta limited but succesful in that role.
Is this freak really this dense, wow! He'll always have me at the top of the page, wow what an idiot! All ya do is this..."stop bugging me"...and you are set for life, he will always ,,bump bump bump...hahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It doesn't matter if the person were public or private in this case because they will still arrest you for "malicious communications" which is defamatory issue.
Here is the link of the most recent arrest:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...cture-him.html
So whether or not you are private or public makes no difference in being arrested.
It may make a difference later in court however if you can prove you are a private figure versus a public figure.
We are going to see more and more of these arrests due to the ignorant trolls on sites like these who like to accuse people of being all sorts of sick characters.
That's basically what I said above that you're quibbling about.
The question is whether or not the Facebook victim is a public figure.
Only as far as her court case is concerned in proving defamation of character in a libel suit.
Being a public or private figure did not stop them from arresting her though, nor did it matter whether it was a social or mass medium.
Your days are numbered.
Better be watching out the window because the cops are coming to get you and throw your ass in jail because you are one of the trolls who called Avante a pedophile. Remember "pedo alert", idiot?
Is that a yes or a no
there's certain elements that need to be proven before it can be considered defamation which I don't believe has happened here.Being a public or private figure did not stop them from arresting her though, nor did it matter whether it was a social or mass medium.
Your days are numbered.
Better be watching out the window because the cops are coming to get you and throw your ass in jail because you are one of the trolls who called Avante a pedophile. Remember "pedo alert", idiot?
I wonder how many more pages you'll back pedal before you finally catch up.
It's an "I don't know what the court will decide". They are the ones who will determine whether or not they are public or private figures.
What you would like to believe one way or the other won't make a bit of difference.
What back pedaling? How can I answer what has not been determined by the courts yet?
Can you? No.
Why? Because it will be determined in court.
You are truly too dense for this subject matter tbh.
Sorry I made the mistake it was worthy of discussing with you.
You just want to troll.
And I have to laugh at that.
Nope.
Absolutely not.
Yuppers,
Looks like you'll be spending a little jail time too.
You better be nice to SBM or you might find him at your house with some of his cop buddies and an arrest warrant.
Well, if his real name was raZon or Avante you might have a point, counselor.Yuppers,
Looks like you'll be spending a little jail time too.
You better be nice to SBM or you might find him at your house with some of his cop buddies and an arrest warrant.
SBM and SA210 posted the full name and picture of the guy they stalked and labeled him a pedophile hundreds of times -- just like in the case you cited. That is the applicable case.
I don't think that is much of an issue anymore.
Now a days we use our pen names to sign with and it is just as binding.
SA210 admitting he is staying backed down now.
Good plan.
You're wrong.
An anonymous poster can not prove his reputation or business was damaged in any way.
Because he's anonymous.
Get it?
Oh yeah, I fully understand what you are saying, but will the legal system see it that way?
That remains to be seen if you think you can hide behind your anonymity and avoid being prosecuted.
If they wanted to prosecute the one named Chump for spreading all the Malicious communications that you spread, all they would have to do is show up with a a search warrant to the owners of this site to get your name and address.
Then we would see how far your quasi-anonymity would get you.
At this point it is only happening in England anyway.
You did exactly the same thing.Oh yeah, I fully understand what you are saying, but will the legal system see it that way?
That remains to be seen if you think you can hide behind your anonymity and avoid being prosecuted.
If they wanted to prosecute the one named Chump for spreading all the Malicious communications that you spread, all they would have to do is show up with a a search warrant to the owners of this site to get your name and address.
Then we would see how far your quasi-anonymity would get you.
At this point it is only happening in England anyway.
SA210 and SBM did it to a real person using his real name and real picture.
Which case do you think the authorities would be more interested in, ours or theirs?
lol If you run into legal trouble, I won't have to do anything.
That's the best part of all of this.
I did?
Ooops!
Guess I'll be joining you in the big house.
Doubt they see my logic in troll-bashing tbh.
As for what they did, you are quibbling over trivialities.
I doubt the cops will be concerned about trivialities.
If they are going to clean up the mess, then they will get all of us.
I did?
Ooops!
Guess I'll be joining you in the big house.
Doubt they see my logic in troll-bashing tbh.
As for what they did, you are quibbling over trivialities.
I doubt the cops will be concerned about trivialities.
If they are going to clean up the mess, then they will get all of us.
SA210 and SBM did it to a real person using his real name and real picture.I did?
Ooops!
Guess I'll be joining you in the big house.
Doubt they see my logic in troll-bashing tbh.
As for what they did, you are quibbling over trivialities.
I doubt the cops will be concerned about trivialities.
If they are going to clean up the mess, then they will get all of us.
Which case do you think the authorities would be more interested in, ours or theirs?
I think they'll be most concerned with those posters who have made a living doing it for the longest time.
Maybe those posters with real high post counts of practically nothing but defamation?
Isn't it a shame?
Now you're going to have to turn into Chump-the-nice-guy, that should ruin your whole troll schtick tbh.
Nope, they will go after the ones who used real names and pictures first.I think they'll be most concerned with those posters who have made a living doing it for the longest time.
Maybe those posters with real high post counts of practically nothing but defamation?
Isn't it a shame?
Now you're going to have to turn into Chump-the-nice-guy, that should ruin your whole troll schtick tbh.
Anonymous posters can't prove any damages to their reputations or livelihood because they are indeed anonymous.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
