yes, if all the protections play out a certain way and then OKC and LAC wind up with exactly the #1 and #2 overall picks. this is not a reasonable way to be looking at the pick.
im not talking about the top of the draft. the depth of this year's class is unusual.This is an incredibly stupid thing people keep saying. Next year’s draft doesn’t have Wemby - but trying to say today that it will be weaker than this year’s is just plain dumb. After Wemby, Scoot and the Thompsons, none of the top players in this draft were high on the radar - they emerged during the season, just like they do every year.
you can play the crystal ball card on anything. i can say that you are a fool to think that wemby will be a very good NBA player because you dont have the crystal ball needed to make that claim.Another pick they didn’t want that you’re projecting your imaginary crystal ball on. And they still got #40 back - which they may value higher than #32 because they might be able to get #40 into a two-way whereas they couldn’t with #32
There are lessons to be learned from having a glut of picks, but this is far from an L from IND, unless you base it on the ignorant premise that every range in next year’s draft will be worse than this year’s (which requires a crystal ball that you don’t have)
people make evaluations ahead of time. its called scouting. not everything is just plain hindsight, theres a degree of projection in this. nobody nails everything but there is a general consensus that this year's draft is deep and that there is pessimism as it relates to next year's crop.

