Reply With Quote
...
“We don’t need to prove fraud. Their fraud was so good, there’s no evidence of fraud. That’s how we know there was fraud. And oh they made voting rules changes because of the pandemic. Uhhh what about all the other states including Texas making pandemic changes too you ask? Uhhhh... well, those four states specifically were extra bad about it. Something, something. Illegal. Democrat. Everybody’s talking about it! The world has ever seen... fraud!”
https://www.yahoo.com/news/trumps-ha...l?guccounter=1They don't give evidence of fraud
Eastman's motion does not offer any specific evidence of any fraud taking place.
Instead, it argues that new ways of voting during the pandemic could have resulted in fraud.
"The cons utional issue is not whether voters committed fraud but whether state officials violated the law by systematically loosening the measures for ballot integrity so that fraud becomes undetectable," it said.
Experts have repeatedly said there is no evidence that mail-in voting systems lead to widespread voter fraud, and many states have had mail-in voting for decades - meaning the new systems rolled out because of the coronavirus pandemic were mostly an expansion of existing voting methods, rather than a new system.
The motion goes on to argue that evidence of fraud may not even be possible to find because the fraud could have been so successful as to be undetectable.
"The unlawful actions of election officials effectively destroy the evidence by which the fraud may be detected," it said.
The motion also argues it is not actually necessary for the Trump campaign to prove fraud took place.
Steve Vladeck, a professor at the University of Texas School of Law, wrote in an NBC News op-ed article that Paxton's lawsuit did not provide evidence that specific instances of voter fraud had taken place.
Instead, Vladeck said, the filing argues against the states' changes to voting rules, even though other states made similar changes.
"Texas is arguing that coronavirus-related changes to election rules in each state violate the federal Cons ution, never mind that most states (including Texas) made such changes this cycle," he wrote, describing the filing as a "Hail Mary attempt."
...
Last edited by boutons_deux; 12-10-2020 at 02:04 PM.
Chris
Another One Dot Jpeg
What does "chain of command" even means? I suppose she means "chain of custody". And that's called hearsay, btw
Derpowitz
happened moments ago in court
“We don’t need to prove fraud. Their fraud was so good, there’s no evidence of fraud. That’s how we know there was fraud. And oh they made voting rules changes because of the pandemic. Uhhh what about all the other states including Texas making pandemic changes too you ask? Uhhhh... well, those four states specifically were extra bad about it. Something, something. Illegal. Democrat. Everybody’s talking about it! The world has ever seen... fraud!”
https://www.yahoo.com/news/trumps-ha...l?guccounter=1
Regardless of what you call it, there's been no account given for these late-night drops.
muh late night drops
Ministry of Truth
You're not even CC'd on the Chumpette memos, tbh.
not pulling any punches
SCOTUS should deny cert, deny all relief. dont entertain this garbage
Imagine being a lawyer and being so unhinged that the legal process is playing out.
Imagine your meltdown when you lose again, derp.Imagine being a lawyer and being so unhinged that the legal process is playing out.
Rescue attempt.Imagine your meltdown when you lose again, derp.
No, derp. I'm telling you to imagine your meltdown when you lose again.
No one who recognizes Trump's historic landslide loss needs rescuing.
What account does need to be given? Either there's evidence of fraud or there's not.
The only unhinged one is the dude spamming the forum on his main and various alts with fake news and copium tweets/videos constantly
What's the explanation? Do you not have one?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
