Reply With Quote
Posting a barrage of tweets no one will read hasn't worked since you started that shtick. Why are you still doing it, TSA?
bruh they specifically appointed John Huber in ing 2017 to investigate the Clinton Foundation4 years later still having a hardon for Hillary ing Clinton. Trump could have pointed a special prosecutor like he said he would years ago, but he didn't, but she's still the ing bad guy
and then more than a year and a half ago they appointed John Durham to investigate the opening of the Trump/Russia investigation for wrongdoing aka obamagate
theyve come up with nothing
Posting a barrage of tweets no one will read hasn't worked since you started that shtick. Why are you still doing it, TSA?
of a meltdown.
Looks like a long list of receipts to me.
Looks like a bunch of embedded tweets on a completely separate topic by a bitter Trump fanboy who won't get the pre election bombs he was hoping for.
I told djohn on multiple occasions that he was overplaying his hand and that Russiagate probably wasn't going to bring down Trump. It doesn't make multiple years of Obama Spygate and Hillary-going-to-prison fanfic any less pathetic.
I like Greenwald, but even he knows what matters is what you can prove in court.
Yeah, not defending djohn here either. He can fend for himself.
?
Greenwald is a journalist. im pretty sure he values a lot of things that arent necessarily proven in court
So when Djohn posts a single tweet from Kyle, it is a meltdown. When TSA posts 50 of them in one post, they're receipts.
What I mean is, he's generally evidence based. He's made a career of releasing and commenting on legit material released by Snowden and similar whitleblowers.
My guess is that Durham came up empty, even by Trash/his low bar, so they went after Hillary as backup.
BOOM!
lmao so the past admin s get a pass by you for their spy ring yet trump's the bad guy for wanting to follow the cons ution, law, and order? what a joke!
In Durham probe, grand jury indicts attorney with ties to Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign
A federal grand jury in Washington, D.C., has handed up an indictment of attorney Michael Sussmann for making a false statement to the FBI, as the bureau investigated the existence of an alleged secret communication channel between the Trump Organization and a Russian bank.
The indictment says that Sussmann, who is based in Washington, D.C., requested a meeting with the FBI general counsel at FBI headquarters in September 2016, in order to provide information that allegedly showed covert communications between the Trump Organization and the Russia-based bank.
But the U.S. alleges Sussmann was lying to the FBI general counsel in claiming that he was not bringing forward the information on behalf of a client. The FBI was led to think he was acting as a concerned citizen when in fact, according to the Justice Department, Sussmann had assembled the information on behalf of clients: Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign and a tech executive. Sussmann had also previously represented the Democratic National Committee, too, in connection with an earlier cyber hack.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/durham-...nton-campaign/
Authorities Arrest Analyst Who Contributed to Steele Dossier
Federal authorities on Thursday arrested an analyst who in 2016 gathered leads about possible links between Donald J. Trump and Russia for what turned out to be Democratic-funded opposition research, according to people familiar with the matter.The arrest of the analyst, Igor Danchenko, is part of the special counsel inquiry led by John H. Durham, who was appointed by the Trump administration to scrutinize the Russia investigation for any wrongdoing, the people said.
Mr. Danchenko, was the primary researcher of the so-called Steele dossier, a compendium of rumors and unproven assertions suggesting that Mr. Trump and his 2016 campaign were compromised by and conspiring with Russian intelligence officials in Moscow’s covert operation to help him defeat Hillary Clinton.
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/04/u...e-dossier.html
Making false statements to fbi significant and newsworthy offense now
That's their MO for both sides.
Get a death grip on their nuts with the "lying to FBI" thing and then go the immunity route to get them to spill their guts.
Considering these lies underpinned the four FISA warrants on Carter Page, yeah, I'd say this is significant and newsworthy.
only works if they... you know... lie to the feds
was anything provided by sussman used in the warrant applications?
Not that I'm aware of, what's your point? The lies by Igor Danchenko sure were and the indictment states those lies underpinned the four FISA warrants on Carter Page.
the problem with the claim that "he lied in 2017 and therefore they knew it was a coverup" is that it doesnt follow. did they know at the time in 2017 he was lying? how does this tie into the warrants which were issued before these statements?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
