Reply With Quote
Couldn't wiki up a response this time, eh?
Why Climate Scientists Have Consistently UNDERestimated Key Global Warming Impacts
While we have recently shown that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) temperature projections have been exceptionally accurate, several other projections in the IPCC reports have been far too conservative.
Sea Level Rise
Arctic Sea Ice Decline
CO2 Emissions
“erring on the side of least drama”
“Our hypothesis of ESLD is not meant as a criticism of scientists. The culture of science has in most respects served humanity very well. Rather, ESLD provides a context for interpreting scientists’ assessments of risk-laden situations, a challenge faced by the public and policy-makers. In attempting to avoid drama, the scientific community may be biasing its own work—a bias that needs to be appreciated because it could prevent the full recognition, articulation, and acknowledgment of dramatic natural phenomena that may, in fact, be occurring. After all, some phenomena in nature are dramatic. If the drama arises primarily from social, political, or economic impacts, then it is crucial that the associated risk be understood fully, and not discounted.”
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/201...rming-impacts/
Why should I respond to your non responses?
Shazbot...
Do you even know what you are linking, or does it just look pretty?
Pass.
That's too bad.
Typical Fuzzy/Agloco...
Respond out of context...
Agloco...
I notice you still refuse to give anything of relevance to scientific topics outside of radiation.
Respond with something meaningful, and I will too.
Isn't the sun remarkable.
Link: Nice CME
^ gets it.
Google is down in his area.
Wasn't aware that I was obligated to. As I've stated earlier, the usefulness of my commentary is inversely proportional to the amount of stupidity that went into making the OP. Unfortunately for you and the rest of us, it abounds in your threads.
How's the latest filmmaking gig going? If you're out West make sure to let me know. We can sit down over a couple of bottles of Sapporo or Ichiban.
I rather sit on an anthill after a maple syrup enema.
actually the script for John head is complete I'm looking for investors!
You got a draft? Dropbox it and PM me a link.actually the script for John head is complete I'm looking for investors!
The problem with bringing your career knowledge to neophyte Google research topics is obvious, you gain nothing. It's the "teach a pig to sing" thing, waste of time and annoys the pig.
Perhaps it is better not to post in threads you wish not to contribute in then, unless you want to be known as something no better than a troll, rash, etc. If your purpose is just to antagonize others, then that says little of you as a person. Doesn't it.
My purpose is to call you out on your bull and I'll do it in any manner I see fit. Most often this can be accomplished with a one liner, which speaks to the quality of your content.
Bull .
Your one liners do not address anything. That's why I call you out on your puny minded behavior.
And this thread does?
You increasingly seem like a Mouse sock-puppet -- to the extent I'm embarrassed I hadn't entertained the notion until lately.
Took me 2 seconds to find that rather glaring hole in the OP/thread le claim.
Another troll thread debunks itself by the 2nd post.
Shup, puny mind!!!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
