yeah and monkeys might fly out of my ass
The Shiites and Kurds can't even agree amongst themselves on the breakdown of their government much less to what degree there should be Sunni involvement.Our politicians can't even agree on how to run *our* country, and you're expecting some people who are trying it for the first time in 30 years to have it all squared away with a snap of their fingers.
It's called politics, and deal making, Dan, they'll get it all figured out over there (much to your chagrin).
By the way Dan, here's yet another sign the Sunnis are coming around...
http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/meast/...ain/index.html
What are you going to have to say when they all join up and kick Zarqawi's ass eight ways from Sunday, along with all his little dip followers?
Things in Iraq are improving, I know it sucks to read that for people like Dan who are rooting for complete failure by anyone even remotely siding with Bush.
Poor Dan, having to root against progress and freedom in order for his side to look good. Oh, please please please don't let Iraq become a successful state!
Here's a tip, Dan -- do like the Europeans are doing -- as Arab states moderate over the next several years, insist that it would have happened anyway, and that American intervention only delayed it. That worked for the fall of communism, too.
But it's good to see that as the old Left (e.g., Dan) is fading into irrelevance like the Whigs did in the 1850's, what with communism dead, socialism proven ineffective, and their own moral imperative undermined by their fixation on amorality, religious "conservatives" are morphing into big-government bleeding-heart liberals to take their place. Gotta have two parties, after all. It doesn't work when your ideology consists of nothing more than:
1) Hating your country and hoping it fails in everything it does
2) Promoting a society whose chief value is unlimited consequence-free recreational sex
yeah everyone whos not republican just wants to see americans killed and iraq become a mecca for terrorism
john kerry would join them if he wasnt so old
those bas s
i wish we could send some tahoes over there
those iraqis wallk around places
yukons and suburbans would be ok too
only a democrat wouldnt do it
escalades would be a waste of money
Not really. The right side won the Iraqi election, but it wasn't the side the W.H. wanted since among the platform the Shiites ran on was to get the U.S. out of Iraq ASAP. That's why we have all these 'negotiations' going on about the eventual breakdown of the government. Allawi is there to stay one way or the other.not only this, but whole religious groups boycotted the election!! and their "election" was just as stinky as our last one.
Do you realize how ing stupid you sound? BUSH wants to get the US out of Iraq ASAP, let alone the Shi'ites.the platform the Shiites ran on was to get the U.S. out of Iraq ASAP.
Then get them out. What the are they still doing there? If the Iraqi government doesn't have the backing of the Iraqi people then it doesn't deserve to exist - its called self determination. Look it up.Do you realize how ing stupid you sound? BUSH wants to get the US out of Iraq ASAP, let alone the Shi'ites.
Yeah, then all that was sacrificed will be for nothing if it fails. Good call. You have the same goals as the terrorists Dan. See any semblance of order and a the formation of a peaceful government fail.
Last edited by Useruser666; 04-02-2005 at 02:16 PM.
Nbadan dropped the knowledge
hey at least gas prices have dropped since the war in iraq
and the country is safer
wait...
Waiting for the Iraqi government to get set up and going, so that when we do leave Zarqawi and Saddam's Ba'athist bas s don't throw the country into civil war and undo everything we did there and everything our troops fought for.Then get them out. What the are they still doing there?
Of course, the success of a new Iraq means that you fail Dan, so I could see why you'd want us to get out before the job is done.
We've got a Republican president who is committed to finishing the job, not running around half-assed with tomahawk diplomacy (and failing miserably at it) like Clitton.
funny, a lot of people like to talk about bush but what are you, personally going to do Dan? Stop whining and just deal with it. No one wants our troops over there to die. Just chill man.
If you want your opinion to be regarded any higher than Dan's perhaps you should stop the same type of rhetoric he spews.We've got a Republican president who is committed to finishing the job, not running around half-assed with tomahawk diplomacy (and failing miserably at it) like Clitton.
Tell me one time Clinton would have had the same type of congressional support Bush saw after 9/11 and I'll show you a time where Clinton would have had the same kind of reaction.
If there is a draft I won't be involved.
Damn. There's the old "Clinton" theory again.
The one time Clinton had the mandate from Congress to do something to make our contry more secure, he fired a few tomahawks into suspected "chemical plants."Tell me one time Clinton would have had the same type of congressional support Bush saw after 9/11 and I'll show you a time where Clinton would have had the same kind of reaction.
Color me unimpressed.
So you are more impressed by Bush who took us to war over suspected "WMD"? Color me very unimpressed.
I forgot, we should sit back until someone kills a lot of Americans, then it's okay to fight.
My bad.
Clinton wasn't sitting back doing nothing and you know it.
But you don't rush into war with faulty intelligence and with Dubya you're starting with faulty intelligence.
The blame Clinton for everything only goes so far.
Get over it.
Seriously, what he do then? Faulty intelligence? Clinton blew up a medicine factory when he thought he was going to be nailing Osama
Well, you and Dan blame Bush for everything, turnabout's fair play.The blame Clinton for everything only goes so far.
AHF, what I want to know is if you honestly believe Congress would have ever let Clinton attack Afghanistan the way Bush did?
Syria had Osama Bin Laden in their hands some years ago. They called Bill Clinton and said, "We have Osama. Do you want him?" And the great President Clinton said, "NO." So, there's a lot we don't blame on Clinton, but there are some things he should take the rap for.
Des, I'd suggest you do some research about what you just said, then come back and edit your post.
#1 You got the country wrong.
#2 You got what happend wrong.
Well then I apologise. Grab a link for me and I'll do some research.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
