Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by jcrod View Post
Since you keep being all up on Chalmers.
First game
Chalmers
11pts 6 ast 2 stl 0rebs
Hill
17pts 1 ast 8rebs 0stl
barely! which means ! a pathetic 2 point win..Speaking of knee-jerk...
Spurs won.
Go jerk yourselves off with the picture of Hill.
Definately no NBA material.
Originally Posted by jcrod View Post
Since you keep being all up on Chalmers.
First game
Chalmers
11pts 6 ast 2 stl 0rebs
Hill
17pts 1 ast 8rebs 0stl
Just like Louis to try and deny the fact that he got proven wrong. Again.
What are you talking about? Hill did awesome tonight!!!
your pimp, suns lost .. you have the basketball IQ of a 2 year old . . quit f'ing talking
Look at the assists idiot!
PGs are known for assists ...
never...........
would you stop talking, the players around you have to hit shots to get assists you degenerate
Screw you. The guys he passed to threw up bricks. off troll.
jay.... the current spurs are not known to hit shots....
Hill may not ever get an assist on the Spurs..
You rookies need to cut Sequ some slack and realize he's too short to actually see the monitor over the desk top.
Hey, I'm not saying Hill is terrible or not NBA worthy, I'm saying it was a big mistake to take him over others... WTF?
Why is he a bad choice?not drafting a player like Chalmers, Arthur or CDR.
All of these players tonight are too raw for the NBA now. The Spurs need players to insert into the lineup and these guys just don't cut it.
Hill is out of control, doesn't have court knowledge and can't shoot. His mental game IQ is too low.
Ian had two post ups that looked promising but other than that he is terrible.
Gist may be able to handle the big boys, looks promising.
I don't get it... , we all saw what chalmers, arthur and CDR did in big games and still Pop and his Klan went with a bunch of bull talent with some ing hope.
I'm pissed. I was wrong, George Hill was a bad choice.
wow that got ass phoenix needs ta get da fuk out with his losing ass
Idiot. Hill is really an SG, and his playing the PG in the Summer League is a way to gauge if he could be a reliable backup PG. If he has 1 assist, that is in no way an indication he fails as a back up PG outright. It's one game, and with all the expectations on him on the Spurs summer league roster, he fared well. He'll be in the bench of San Antonio as an SG.
And since you are also so in love with Chalmers, every team right now in the NBA expect their Point Guard also to be able to score and rebound.
Segu, hes going to be a better player than Chalmers and CDR ... there is no question or doubts for people who have followed Hill's career and have followed CDR and Chalmers... Hill is deadly.. once he gets in his confidence and established with his teamates... hes simply a better player... all around.. and it will show in the weeks ahead.... if i were you i would stfu and wait so we cant quote you in a few weeks and it will save alot of you some embarassment.. let the guys get off the plane in SA before you run them out of town... that would be nice..
these aren't made with impatience, they are made with alot of hardwork, practice and good coaching.. he had an off shooting night or he would have had 25+ which is what your going to see.. because hes going to keep getting fouled.. he always gets fouled, he always drives up big numbers from the stripe.. hes a slasher...
an NBA caliber slasher... he is not a mark jackson, john stockton PG, get it outa your head.
Well, I hope you're right. CDR and Chalmers played, won and starred against the toughest compe ion out there. It would've been smart to go with a given than another ray of sunshine. He won't get all those calls in the NBA holmes... Parker's ass get's rode from the time he gets the ball across the line all the way to the goal. He usually ends up in the first row with a bucket, a bruise and no foul....Segu, hes going to be a better player than Chalmers and CDR ... there is no question or doubts for people who have followed Hill's career and have followed CDR and Chalmers... Hill is deadly.. once he gets in his confidence and established with his teamates... hes simply a better player... all around.. and it will show in the weeks ahead.... if i were you i would stfu and wait so we cant quote you in a few weeks and it will save alot of you some embarassment.. let the guys get off the plane in SA before you run them out of town... that would be nice..
an NBA caliber slasher... he is not a mark jackson, john stockton PG, get it outa your head.
Hopefully Hill can learn that trade....
Still would've been smarter to go with Chalmers....
Sorry...
I know that's your bit - to be negative about the Spurs, but really why are there so many fans on this forum that are "half-empty" fans. Dog on our FO all you want, have they really failed? 4 rings; WCF last year and in 2006 with lineups that were never great lineups. Where did they go wrong? If you think that we'll ever put together the lineup the Celtics had this year, you are fooling yourself. We have a system that has proven to be successful and it has never relied upon signing "great FA's" or drafting college studs. Our FO drafts and signs players that they think fit our system - period. Once we miss the playoffs, then you can complain. Until then, STFU!
Do you wear one of those bracelets that says WWJD?
Is he supposed to make the shot as well after he passes it to teammates? The shooters tonight sucked.
Nope, but I'm interested in your correlation. What gives?
Yep, opening a thread started by Sequ was a big mistake...
I had me some pie tonight. That, my friend, was not a big mistake.
im just glad im late getting to this forums and didnt have to see the other 17 thousand posts.
he had 8 rebs, only one person had more and Hill's 6'2 thats good enough for me and he D'd up the 3rd pick in the draft who is 4-6 inches taller
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
