Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 53
  1. #26
    Can't Start Threads
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    2,417
    I don't know why it is taking the mainstream media so long to figure out Horry won't be back. After RC straight up said it during a summer league broadcast, that should have closed the door.

    Finley, unless another team decides to open the bank, will be back. That scares me because Pop might overplay him, however that is the case. Finley as a deep reserve would be pretty good insurance. Finley as a starter or even a main player off the bench would be a disaster.
    thats why i dont want finley around....we lost last season, we may lose again this season............id rather lose with rookies then lose with veterans, one thing is for sure, after next season there will be another and then another..im close to 50, fish and play basketball everyday if god allows, and i can personally tell ya, you lose alot from age 32 to 35.......finley barely had anything when we got him....finley has nothing left...if the FO keeps the fin. the FO would be making another stupid move imo....and they aint made one yet this offseason

  2. #27
    Can't Start Threads
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    2,417
    I think Pop will use him as a deep reserve. And that's not a bad thing. I know Spurs fans think having Finley back would be a disaster, but it really isn't - if his playing time is limited. He's a great veteran presence and will help the younger players on this team learn things both on and off the court. I trust Pop knows that Finley geting 20+ mpg isn't a good thing for this team.
    when the younger guys begin to collapse under pressure and we go on a 3 maybe even 4 game losing streak(something unheard of around here for yrs) if fin is on the end of the bench guess what pop is gonna do?...and then guess what fin is gonna do? pop is gonna put fin in and fin is gonna score lights out and we are right back to this thread next season again.........lose the dead weight

  3. #28
    Free Throw Coach Aggie Hoopsfan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Post Count
    31,094
    I think Pop will use him as a deep reserve. And that's not a bad thing. I know Spurs fans think having Finley back would be a disaster, but it really isn't - if his playing time is limited. He's a great veteran presence and will help the younger players on this team learn things both on and off the court. I trust Pop knows that Finley geting 20+ mpg isn't a good thing for this team.
    Come on Kori, Finley will be treated like Horry was this past season. We'll get to the playoffs and he'll get his playing time for his veteran presence, even if he's giving us jack out on the court.

    Pop's had a mancrush on Fin ever since he came here for cheap while Cuban was still paying him 20 mil a year.

    The moment Mason struggles and Manu is gimpy, we'll be treated to the human turnstile logging significant minutes at the two.

    And that sucks.

  4. #29
    Out with the old... Obstructed_View's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    41,715
    The moment Mason struggles and Manu is gimpy, we'll be treated to the human turnstile logging significant minutes at the two.

    And that sucks.
    Not half as bad as when he's logging significant minutes at the 4. Just wait.

  5. #30
    Five Rings... Kori Ellis's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Post Count
    64,671
    Come on Kori, Finley will be treated like Horry was this past season. We'll get to the playoffs and he'll get his playing time for his veteran presence, even if he's giving us jack out on the court.
    Robert Horry played 8-10 mpg in the playoffs with a few DNP CD's mixed in.

  6. #31
    Veteran AFBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    10,868
    The way this article is written it sounds like Finley, not the Spurs, is the one taking his time to make his decision. If that's the case, it tells me that Pop and co. have likely told him he'll have a much smaller role and will have to compete for minutes with all the other wings.

    Boston, in the meantime, lost Posey and could probably offer a more significant role. Then there's the hometown Chicago Bulls and all their turmoil...they could really use a veteran presence. Finley could opt for either situations over the Spurs at this point.

    I think there's probably still a REALLY good chance Finley is back with the Spurs, but I don't think it will be as the "starter" necessarily. Fin will have to prove himself.

    Having said all that, I think there's a very good chance that Mason and/or Udoka fail to live up to expectations fairly early and Finley moves up the depth chart if he's on this team.

  7. #32
    Veteran bigfan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    1,910
    I have no problem keeping Finley if the price is right. Now that Bones and Big Shot Rob are gone, having an experienced marksman on the bench may come in handy during the season.

  8. #33
    Spurs fan in Las Vegas Drom John's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    3,686
    If we were talking early ABA, (WHL, USFL), then Finley is big enough of a name to merit a lot more money than the NBA.

    So now that we have the cash rich Europeans. Is an aging former star worth a European bid?

    Likewise, could Horry retire to Europe?

  9. #34
    Watching the collapse benefactor's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Post Count
    42,233
    Im with all the rest that are worried...this situation makes me feel like I have an ulcer coming on.

    I like Finley. He has been a good role player for us and has hit some clutch shots. But with the way Pop has the tendency to go to certain players that he likes for long stretches makes this move worrisome. I don't want to see Mason have a good shooting year only to rot on the bench during important stretches in the playoffs while Pop thinks he should use his "proven" players.

  10. #35
    Believe. MarHill's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    1,591
    I have no problem keeping Finley if the price is right. Now that Bones and Big Shot Rob are gone, having an experienced marksman on the bench may come in handy during the season.

    Yep, I agree!

    I'm one of the few pro-Finley people and what the anti-Finley don't seem to get is that a coach especially someone like Pop like players who are professional and fits well with the chemistry of his team.

    I know some have said that Pop has a man-crush on Finley. Whatever!

    Yes, he has been inconsistent with shooting. But in the three years, I've seen him as a Spur he has several big shots in key moments of the game. Remember Game 1 of Spurs-Suns playoff series this past season.

    I like him coming back as a reserve off the bench and he can eat up some minutes during the regular season as well.

    C'mon on back Finley!!!!

  11. #36
    Spur Forever urunobili's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    14,291
    i like him as a Danny Ferry 2003 kinda role and i think that is exactly what Pop will do with him... Roger Mason is here to take his old minutes

  12. #37
    Bo Knows Spurs remingtonbo2001's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    4,095
    What's with all the Finley hate.

    It's as though Bonner and Finley have taken the Rasho/Beno role from 06'.

    Really folks, having Finley's verteran presence would be great for this ball club.

  13. #38
    Damn You Commies T Park's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    55,054
    Don't you know?

    Pop HATES younger players.

    Ignore 2005 and 2003 though.

  14. #39
    The OL' Perfessor wildbill2u's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Post Count
    8,641
    I think Pop will use him as a deep reserve. And that's not a bad thing. I know Spurs fans think having Finley back would be a disaster, but it really isn't - if his playing time is limited. He's a great veteran presence and will help the younger players on this team learn things both on and off the court. I trust Pop knows that Finley geting 20+ mpg isn't a good thing for this team.
    The scary part of the upcoming season is relying on Mason as the Findog replacement as an outside shooter. He had one decent shooting year out of four. What if this wasn't a breakout year and he doesn't come through--and we all know about the 'first year shooter's curse' on the Spurs.

    I'm not sure Finley is the ideal guy we'd want, but we might need what he's got left. And that's scary.

  15. #40
    Veteran AFBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    10,868
    Don't you know?

    Pop HATES younger players.

    Ignore 2005 and 2003 though.
    This has nothing to do with the topic, but your sarcasm is WAY overused. Of the 46K posts you've made, how many do you think actually contributed to an argument or weren't drenched with sarcasm?

    Just an observation.

  16. #41
    Watching the collapse benefactor's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Post Count
    42,233
    What's with all the Finley hate.

    It's as though Bonner and Finley have taken the Rasho/Beno role from 06'.

    Really folks, having Finley's verteran presence would be great for this ball club.
    Veteran presence? Yes. More minutes than he should be playing? No.

    I think most of the hate is coming from fears of the latter happening, because anyone who has watched the Spurs over the last few years knows thats how Pop likes to roll.

  17. #42
    Veteran AFBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    10,868
    Veteran presence? Yes. More minutes than he should be playing? No.

    I think most of the hate is coming from fears of the latter happening, because anyone who has watched the Spurs over the last few years knows thats how Pop likes to roll.
    If he earns it by virtue of good shooting, there should be no problem with Finley getting minutes.

    If he earns it by default because of poor play by Mason and Udoka....Spurs are in trouble.

  18. #43
    Watching the collapse benefactor's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Post Count
    42,233
    If he earns it by virtue of good shooting, there should be no problem with Finley getting minutes.

    If he earns it by default because of poor play by Mason and Udoka....Spurs are in trouble.
    Agreed.

  19. #44
    Murdering Prostitutes Findog's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    21,565
    Why aren't the Mavs trying to bring Finley home?

  20. #45
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Post Count
    1,861
    Why aren't the Mavs trying to bring Finley home?
    I'm puzzled by that as well, considering Cuban's past comments:

    "I would hope that after his contract is over in San Antone, he would consider the Mavs as an option," Cuban said Monday. "I don't know that he would, but our entire organization has that much respect for him."
    I'm pretty sure though that the Mavs can only offer him a minimum contract now that they've used up their exceptions (at least I believe they have). The Spurs can offer him more than any other team, but there's no guarantee that they are willing to do so.

  21. #46
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Post Count
    7,288
    If Mason doesn't start, then we're off to a bad start.

    In theory bringing Finley back for a deep reserve role sounds nice but I still don't trust it. If he couldn't even come off the bench as a 6 man to be productive, then how is he going to function as an 8th or 9th player off the bench? I don't see it happening. Looking back it was unnatural how much the team had to work to accommodate him so that he could be productive. That's why I think they should try to find a younger player to develop. I've lost confidence in the coaching staff to develop young players but they're going to have to this season. We can't keep doing the same old anymore.
    Agree 100%, if Mason doesn't start then we definitely are screwed.

    Pop keeps favoring veteran players even if they don't produce. He's gambling that he'll see one final act of brilliance. We played Van Exel to the detriment of Beno Udirh, we played Stodamire to the detriment of maybe even DeMarr Johnson. We gave Finley an unbelievable amount of minutes to contribute, while more efficient players like Udoka sat on the bench.

    Enough already!

  22. #47
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Post Count
    7,288
    The scary part of the upcoming season is relying on Mason as the Findog replacement as an outside shooter. He had one decent shooting year out of four. What if this wasn't a breakout year and he doesn't come through--and we all know about the 'first year shooter's curse' on the Spurs.

    I'm not sure Finley is the ideal guy we'd want, but we might need what he's got left. And that's scary.
    That's completely unfounded! Finley at his prime was better than Mason in his prime (i.e. now). Unfortunately Father Time has caught up, Mason without a doubt is not only a better shooter but a more versatile player than can play point and penetrate. One other thing, Mason can hit the shot off the dribble... not happening with Finley.

    Besides, if you want to have a player that did exactly what Finley did for us (that is do nothing but camp on the 3 point line), then you've got Bonner, Udoka, Bowen and Tolliver to do that.

  23. #48
    Ghost of Mr. K SenorSpur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Post Count
    14,918
    If Mason doesn't start, then we're off to a bad start.

    In theory bringing Finley back for a deep reserve role sounds nice but I still don't trust it. If he couldn't even come off the bench as a 6 man to be productive, then how is he going to function as an 8th or 9th player off the bench? I don't see it happening. Looking back it was unnatural how much the team had to work to accommodate him so that he could be productive. That's why I think they should try to find a younger player to develop. I've lost confidence in the coaching staff to develop young players but they're going to have to this season. We can't keep doing the same old anymore.
    The Truth speaks the truth!

  24. #49
    Ghost of Mr. K SenorSpur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Post Count
    14,918
    Agree 100%, if Mason doesn't start then we definitely are screwed.

    Pop keeps favoring veteran players even if they don't produce. He's gambling that he'll see one final act of brilliance. We played Van Exel to the detriment of Beno Udirh, we played Stodamire to the detriment of maybe even DeMarr Johnson. We gave Finley an unbelievable amount of minutes to contribute, while more efficient players like Udoka sat on the bench.

    Enough already!


    Don't forget an unbelievable number of shots afforded to Finley as well. His wild inconsistency was one of the key factors that led to his departure from the Mavs - via the amnesty rule.

    I truly get the loyalty and "extra rope" Pop affords to proven veterans. However when their performance becomes wildly inconsistent and their skills decline to the point where their on-court presence becomes counter productive, that's a problem. That's where Finley is now. If we see it, surely Pop sees it too. Blind loyalty and denial is a dangerous thing.

    I'll say it again. The offensive droughts this team had during the season and the playoffs occurred with Finley as starting 2-guard. As was stated earlier, If Finley couldn't cut it as a starter, how the can he be expected to produce as a 4th or 5th wing?

  25. #50
    Veteran AFBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    10,868
    That's completely unfounded! Finley at his prime was better than Mason in his prime (i.e. now). Unfortunately Father Time has caught up, Mason without a doubt is not only a better shooter but a more versatile player than can play point and penetrate. One other thing, Mason can hit the shot off the dribble... not happening with Finley.

    Besides, if you want to have a player that did exactly what Finley did for us (that is do nothing but camp on the 3 point line), then you've got Bonner, Udoka, Bowen and Tolliver to do that.
    We HOPE Mason is a better shooter and we HOPE he has the ability to hit the shot off the dribble and penetrate, but wildbill2u's assertion isn't "completely unfounded".

    Mason has had one decent shooting year, and really a good 10-game stretch where he started and was extremely productive. Spurs fans, most of which never heard of Mason before he signed with the team, are HOPING that he can recreate that production....but it's not a given.

    If Mason does falter (let's hope not!) early and Udoka struggles to be consistent, the Spurs will need SOMEONE to pick up the slack. If it's Finley, the Spurs are screwed. But let's be honest, if it's anyone else....the Spurs are screwed.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •