Reply With Quote
That and multiple le possiblilties.The only thing keeping Pop here is the control he has
He's not Larry Brown.
Why would Pop leave, with the core resigned for a few years, anyway?
That and multiple le possiblilties.The only thing keeping Pop here is the control he has
He's not Larry Brown.
I don't get this comment. You've devoted significant bandwidth in another thread to arguing that Gregg Popovich has a win-at-all-costs at ude, and castigating him for dragging the franchise through the s that such an at ude begets. You argue that such an at ude is a bad thing. Now you're arguing that the Spurs would be in serious trouble without Pop. Are you a fan of serious trouble? Are your takes just inconsistent? Are you just trying to see who's listening? Is there some ridiculously fine-line distinction you're trying to make? I'm really confused. . . . .
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
