Question for Palin Supporters

[Wild Cobra]

SHe's a flip flopper and has questionable judgement.

Please tell us your evidence. As for the bridge, she supported a state funded project and rejected the federal project. That's not a flip-flop. Is there something else?

[Wild Cobra]

None of the alleged scandals involving Obama have gotten any in-depth exposure by the media.

You are absolutely right.

They take Obama's explaination with no 'investigative reporting' and do all they can to report dirt on Palin.

Why don't the lib s see this?

[ManuTim_best of Fwiendz]

Spare me.

When has Obama ever had to answer for like Ayers? All he's said is "I don't agree with he did, but he's a friend."

Ayers using terrorism, 40 years , is such a convenient stupid excuse on Obama's part. The fact Ayers still maintains his views, makes me wonder how much Obama just sat there in his meetings with that guy, nodding his head on how America needs to be "changed."
His rhetoric and rebuttals smacks of a habitual liar , that he believes his lies which is why comes off so sincere on camera. The fact that it's stated in a later biography edition of his books that accounts are a composite of his life and experiences prove he is a bull artist. And just this week he says "I thought about joining the army -- but there were no wars" was the stupidest ing thing I've ever heard. After the whole country was inundated with McCain's POW experience proves that this unknown will re-invent himself to please the crowd and popular opinion.

Howabout Rezko? When is the press going to get to ask the hard questions? All I see is Obama ducking the issue, and the media doing nothing to call him on it.

yeah, that Rezko thing should be constantly brought up.
After digging dirt on Palin, and then digging into Obama, the "negatives" on not to trust Palin, are so weak and reaching. The uses of "per diem" ? Give me a ing break.
Meanwhile Obama's information is incredibly detailed, the only credit you can give his campaign is how they've managed to quell and suppress these legitimate red flags as "harmless" "guilt by association" relying on people to actually buy his . Why should we take his word for it?


The report on how he ignored low income residents protesting his bid for state senate, because of his connections with slumlords like Rezko, is pretty damning.
All he says is "I didn't know!" and he gets off the hook; and his game of "self-awareness" to counter-act criticism with his response "it was the biggest boneheaded mistake of my life" is bull . He must think we're really stupid. Meanwhile his 13th district that Obama was in charge of has been left unchanged and he proposes a bunch of flawed policies that play into these s bags like Rezko hands.
People should really be waking up to judging what kind of character Obama has from these reports. His ties to these ers reveal how this guy is too passive and impressionable, regardless if his patriotism has been called into question--unfairly or not.

To me he seems easily influenced on his world view when he says like "terrorist has legitimate" claims. It's obvious he listens to these left-anti war radicals, who politicize the war for the sake of their own agendas without objecting.

[ManuTim_best of Fwiendz]

[QUOTE=Wild Cobra;2761443][QUOTE=Yonivore;2761390]None of the alleged scandals involving Obama have gotten any in-depth exposure by the media.

You are absolutely right.

They take Obama's explaination with no 'investigative reporting' and do all they can to report dirt on Palin.

Why don't the lib s see this?

I surprisingly found a CNN on Obama's Chicago political start.



Usually CNN is slanted, but nobody called Obama out for his "different kind of politics" he's stating now..his campaign is full of bull artists.


If we get anything out of this election, hopefully the media will be forced to reform their unbiased reporting despite the huge conglomerates pulling the strings. The boycotting of US weekly, etc. was encouraging.
MSNBC firing those two Obama suckers Matthews and Olberman, because of their ratings dips.
CNN changing its new slogan to "no bull, no bias" seems disingenuous but maybe they're forced to curb their liberal bias.

IMO MSNBC has probably been the tiest newsreporting channel of them all in the last few years. I don't think that's gonna change with their empty gestures just to get ratings back.

[boutons_]

"do all they can to report dirt on Palin." because there is plenty of dirt, current dirt, on Palin. as always the fear-and-smear attack machine loves to dish it out, but are too chicken to take it.