priorities of a tree-hugger

[baseline bum]

Is Yahweh and Christian God the same person? Cause Yahweh's a prick.

[Findog]

and don't stick words in my mouth. never did i say what you suggested i said.

It's the logical conclusion to outlawing abortion. If you don't want to come across as an idiot, change your arguments or stay silent. There will never come a time when no abortions are performed. The goal is to reduce the # of abortions, right? You don't have to outlaw abortion or overturn R v. W to do that. What it will do is lead to women bleeding to death in back alleys because they will seek abortions out regardless of whether it's legal or not. You support women bleeding to death in back alleys. If you supported a reduced incidence of abortion, you'd be fine with the law the way it is.

do a little research before you open your mouth and spew lies you know nothing about.

Sorry, but opposition to legalized abortion is the result of not thinking through the logical consequences of your position. It's infantile.

Do you support comprehensive sex-ed, or abstinence only education? Should we give condoms to teenagers? Should we put teenagers on birth control? Your answer to this will determine a lot about how seriously to take your position.

[baseline bum]

I'd have a bit more respect for the pro-life point of view if they didn't support the GOP, which has no interest in these kids once they're born.

The life is sacred until the kid is born. Then, him until he turns 18 and can be sent off to war.

[ratm1221]

You are a cliche.

The bible is full of clichés.

[Findog]

The life is sacred until the kid is born. Then, him until he turns 18 and can be sent off to war.

May he rest in peace. I wonder if honestfool supports Head Start. If he doesn't, then his anti-abortion jihad is hypocritical and uninformed.

[Shastafarian]

May he rest in peace. I wonder if honestfool supports Head Start. If he doesn't, then his anti-abortion jihad is hypocritical and uninformed.

When things like this would describe him do you really need to ask if he supports it? I'd wager he doesn't even know what it is.

[honestfool84]

It's the logical conclusion to outlawing abortion. If you don't want to come across as an idiot, change your arguments or stay silent. There will never come a time when no abortions are performed. The goal is to reduce the # of abortions, right? You don't have to outlaw abortion or overturn R v. W to do that. What it will do is lead to women bleeding to death in back alleys because they will seek abortions out regardless of whether it's legal or not. You support women bleeding to death in back alleys. If you supported a reduced incidence of abortion, you'd be fine with the law the way it is.






Sorry, but opposition to legalized abortion is the result of not thinking through the logical consequences of your position. It's infantile.

Do you support comprehensive sex-ed, or abstinence only education? Should we give condoms to teenagers? Should we put teenagers on birth control? Your answer to this will determine a lot about how seriously to take your position.

READING COMPREHENSION 101 - FAILED.


go back and read the first post.
i said it's stupid the priorities that are in place, saving trees and animals but allowing the murder of babies.

i didn't say, "hey, let's try to stop abortion"

[Findog]

READING COMPREHENSION 101 - FAILED.


go back and read the first post.
i said it's stupid the priorities that are in place, saving trees and animals but allowing the murder of babies.

i didn't say, "hey, let's try to stop abortion"

Who the are you to come in here and suggest that people who disagree with you on this issue care more about animals and vegetation than the complex issues involved with abortion? It's not a black and white issue. you and your strawman.

[Shastafarian]

READING COMPREHENSION 101 - FAILED.


go back and read the first post.
i said it's stupid the priorities that are in place, saving trees and animals but allowing the murder of babies.

i didn't say, "hey, let's try to stop abortion"

Then what does "allowing the murder of babies" mean in the context of your post? Just a helpful, unbiased contrast?

[honestfool84]

Then what does "allowing the murder of babies" mean in the context of your post? Just a helpful, unbiased contrast?

it means just that.

the same people who say "lets save the trees and animals" are the ones that "allow the brutal murdering of babies" - and it goes back to my main point: their priorities are screwed up.

since when are animals and trees more important than humans?

[Findog]

it means just that.

the same people who say "lets save the trees and animals" are the ones that "allow the brutal murdering of babies" - and it goes back to my main point: their priorities are screwed up.

since when are animals and trees more important than humans?

You're dumber than Sarah Palin.

[Shastafarian]

since when are animals and trees more important than humans?

Good question. Why don't you answer it for me and tell me where anyone has those priorities in that order.

[remingtonbo2001]

You're dumber than Sarah Palin.

What does that make you?

I don't see you running a town, or a state for that matter.

Do you even run a business? A household?

[Findog]

What does that make you?

I don't see you running a town, or a state for that matter.

Do you even run a business? A household?

Considering she came into office as Mayor of Wasilla with a budget surplus and left it with a budget deficit, I think I could do better. She "ran" those en ies poorly.

I also think I could get through an interview with Katie Couric or Charlie Gibson without coming across as developmentally disabled.

I'm not running for VP. Do you deny that she's unqualified for the office she seeks?

[honestfool84]

Good question. Why don't you answer it for me and tell me where anyone has those priorities in that order.

ask any hippie tree-hugger if they support abortion.
that'll find more than a few, for you.

[Findog]

ask any hippie tree-hugger if they support abortion.
that'll find more than a few, for you.

You're dumber than Sarah Palin.

[honestfool84]

You're dumber than Sarah Palin.

palin has nothing to do with this.
i mean, if you want to throw out her name, we can.

sarah palin is hotter than your mom.
happy? enough sarah palin?

how about we get back to the point at hand.

[Findog]

palin has nothing to do with this.
i mean, if you want to throw out her name, we can.

sarah palin is hotter than your mom.
happy? enough sarah palin?

how about we get back to the point at hand.

My mom is smarter than Sarah Palin.

The point at hand is that you threw up a ridiculous strawman argument and you're getting called on it.

[Shastafarian]

ask any hippie tree-hugger if they support abortion.
that'll find more than a few, for you.

Maybe they don't view abortion as "murdering babies" like some people do. You disagree. Congratulations.

[honestfool84]

Maybe they don't view abortion as "murdering babies" like some people do. You disagree. Congratulations.

whatever they view abortion as, it doesn't matter.

y'all are dancing around the topic and avoiding the prevailing question:

the question still remains, which is the point of the original post - how can they view trees and animals more importantly than humans?

[honestfool84]

My mom is smarter than Sarah Palin.

The point at hand is that you threw up a ridiculous strawman argument and you're getting called on it.

it's a question, which you have failed to address.

[Findog]

it's a question, which you have failed to address.

I'm sorry, what was the question?

What is a "tree-hugger?" You might be taken a lot more seriously if you didn't use pejoratives to describe people who believe that climate change is real and think we should do something about it...or if you didn't insist that it's impossible to be in favor of doing something about climate change and be opposed to abortion.

Your argument is a pejorative strawman, and you are dumber than Sarah Palin.

[Findog]

the question still remains, which is the point of the original post - how can they view trees and animals more importantly than humans?

Who is "they?" Who says "they" view animals and trees as "more important" than humans?

off with your strawman bull .

It's like asking somebody "When did you stop beating your wife?"

You are dumber than Sarah Palin.

[Shastafarian]

whatever they view abortion as, it doesn't matter.

y'all are dancing around the topic and avoiding the prevailing question:

the question still remains, which is the point of the original post - how can they view trees and animals more importantly than humans?

I'm pretty sure I did answer the question. "They don't view abortion as 'murdering babies' like some do". Think about it.

[honestfool84]

Who is "they?" Who says "they" view animals and trees as "more important" than humans?

off with your strawman bull .

It's like asking somebody "When did you stop beating your wife?"

You are dumber than Sarah Palin.

i am dumber than sarah palin, i will not argue with that.
with that out of the way, you can stop bringing it up.

and strawman? wtf?

ask 10 'environmentalists' on their view of abortion, and you'll see that i am right.

they go hand in hand.