Ben and Jerry kicks ass. Best cartoon ever.
Yeah, whenever I think of Ben and Jerry, I think of some serious ass-kciking.
![]()
![]()
Ben and Jerry kicks ass. Best cartoon ever.
Classic cartoons take these pieces of and smokes em.
That's an ice cream, chief.
Wow, I just realized I have been saying Ben and Jerry,
when I really meant Tom and Jerry....wow I am a dumbass.
What can I say, I have Ben and Jerry's ice cream in my freezer.
I was channel surfing last night, and ran across a cartoon called "Duck Dodgers". I think that is just a stupid cartoon. I don't know what it was about it, I didn't know daffy duck had his own thing going on. DUMB!
![]()
This thread is classic.
Y'know, I've never, ever done this before. But I am finally forced to create my first signature.
Faccia, a lot of other people apparently share your opinion.
http://www.cnn.com/2005/SHOWBIZ/TV/0....ap/index.html
Boy's campaign saves Bugs Bunny
Pe ion convinces network to make characters less menacing
Wednesday, April 27, 2005 Posted: 4:09 PM EDT (2009 GMT)
Thomas Adams' pe ion asked Warner Bros. to create new characters instead of "ruining" the old ones.
RELATED
• Save Our Looney Tunes
YOUR E-MAIL ALERTS
Cartoon
or Create your own
Manage alerts | What is this?
TULSA, Oklahoma (AP) -- Eleven-year-old Thomas Adams thought Warner Bros. had gone daffy when he saw the company's plans for a new cartoon called "Loonatics," based on Bugs Bunny and his Looney Tunes pals.
The grimacing, hollow-eyed, power-fisted prototypes of a futuristic Bugs, Wile E. Coyote and Road Runner struck the boy as dark and scary. In the words of Daffy Duck, he found them "dethh-picable."
Now, nearly two months after starting an Internet pe ion drive against the TV series' fall debut, Thomas has gotten the company's attention.
Warner Bros. Entertainment spokesman Scott Rowe said his company wants the thousands of fans upset by the made-over characters unveiled in February to know "that's NOT all, folks." (Warner Bros. is a division of Time Warner, as is CNN.)
Those "early drawings" have been revised into characters that are softer and less menacing, he said.
"We heard the outcry from fans, including Thomas," Rowe said.
That's enough to draw an emphatic "YESSS!" from the lanky fifth-grader who started the stir with fewer than 20 signatures on a piece of paper at his private school.
Thomas couldn't figure out what was up with the plans to turn the old Looney Tunes gang into their Japanese anime-styled descendants. The prototypes depicted sword-eared superheroes, such as "Buzz Bunny," battling evil in the year 2772.
"Those weren't the Looney Tunes I know," said the boy, whose favorite classic character is the Tasmanian Devil "besides Bugs, of course."
Thomas' parents, Rachel and John Adams, suggested he might have more success by taking his drive to the Web. A family friend who runs an Internet design business was willing to help.
Between piano lessons and shooting hoops, the boy pedaled his bike to the friend's house over several evenings to work on the site's content. On February 28, www.saveourlooneytunes.com came on line.
The pe ion asked Warner Bros. to create entirely new characters for the series instead of "ruining" the old ones.
Within days, the response had overwhelmed the family's home computer. By late March, more than 25,000 people from around the world had signed the pe ion. After a CNN story on Thomas aired in mid-April, the site had tallied 80,000 signatures and 95,000 hits, the family said.
"Keep up the fight," fellow fans urged in their e-mails, calling the boy an inspiration.
The passion of fans for the old characters is understandable, said Bob Bergen, the voice actor behind Porky's stutter and Tweety's "putty tat" the past 15 years.
The "early drawings" of the original Loonatics characters.
"They've been around since the 1930s," he said. "They've been around as long as classic motion pictures."
Bergen, who decided at age 5 he wanted to be Porky Pig and "just pursued it," is not involved in the new series' development, but he cautions fans against rushing to judgment before it airs.
"The kids who are going to be seeing this are not as versed in classic Looney Tunes as these fans are," he said. "Let the target audience be the judge."
The "Loonatics" -- scheduled to air Saturday mornings come fall on Kids' WB! -- is aimed at 6-to-11-year-olds. Test groups loved it, Rowe said.
It's not intended to replaced the original characters, which appear in new episodes on Cartoon Network and classic shows on the network's station Boomerang.
"We just wanted to create something that would be accessible and fun to a new generation of kids," he said.
He said the redrawn characters will be unveiled at a later date but that "Loonatics" will remain an action-adventure show.
Thomas, who has dreams of becoming a cartoonist or comedian, hopes Warner Bros. also will continue to create new episodes for the old Looney Tunes gang.
Thrilled to have made a difference in a way his mother calls "a David and Goliath story," the young activist is considering a new protest.
"I was thinking about doing one against homework," he said.
Do you guys remember in the early 1990's, they released those T-Shirts of single Looney Tune characters but like in Ghetto Form?
They had like Bugs Bunny wearing a backwards black cap, with multiple earrings, wearing sagging shorts, or Tazmanian Devil pretty much looking the same exact way? And like so many kids and pre teen and teens wore them?? They were MAD popular for a while. But then they just....disappeared...
Just saw the picture....don't like it. So, I won't watch them.
I got over those cartoons. I watch Family Guy, Futurama, The Oblongs, and Harvey Birdman.
Adult Swim Rules!!
Good take baseline.Y'know if you ever get a chance to see some of the old interviews with the creators of the looney tunes characters, all of them say they created those cartoons for themselves because thats what they thought was funny.They were never trying to please anyone but themselves, and it shows.... some of the funniest (and most copied) gags in cartoons were introduced in those comic shorts.
True, over the decades cartoons slowly eroded into a marketing device used to sell action figures, video games, cereal and etc. It's crap like The Care Bears,The Smurfs and a mul ude of others I can't name where cleverness and creativity are sacrificed for the benefit of the allmighty dollar.
And people are left wondering where are the honest laughs? Can we watch something like back in the day that left us with a tear in our eye because it was so damn funny?
Yes there is.
Lets not shortchange some of the toons that continue to strive to carry the standard set by thier forefathers so to speak, The Simpsons, Family Guy, Futurama and many others (mostly seen on Adult Swim by the way) are succeeding in maintaining a high quality of comedy from sight gags, social and political commentary as well as just plain buffoonery.
The creators care about the product thats being presented and it's this kind of mix or chemistry that made those same cartoons from the 30's, 40's and 50's just as funny!!
So while there will always be garbage like the "new looney tunes" *yawn* Thank God there are still those that aren't satisfied with the status quo and continue to push the envelope to not only please themselves but give us entertainment that our kids will tell thier kids about.
I wish they still showed Merry Melodies
One of my favorite is when Bugs and Elmer are like doing a viking opera or something and they just chase each other around all stage
And bugs puts fertilizer on elmer's head and flowers grow lol
then he quickly turns into a girl and they get married
hahaha
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)