Iraq's Sharpshooting Rebel Legend

[Useruser666]

Is writing on a wall vandalism?

See how vague that is?

[MannyIsGod]

I'm not saying we're using terror. I'm saying that your defenition of terrorism does not apply in this scenario.

It's so hard for you to step outside of your United States box. You believe that we're the most noble country on earth, and you believe everything we do militarly has a noble motive.

Yet, I'm the one who's blind?

Dude, I haven't even tried to insult you once in this thread, I tried to keep the discussion very simple, and you resort to..

go play your guitar or something..

You're right about one thing, I obviously should find something better to do.

[MannyIsGod]

I would think that you would be able to define terrorism Chris. I can define vandlism, it's not very hard.

Vandlism would simply be the destruction or defacing of someone elses property without consent. Anyone commiting said act would then be a vandle.

That's not vauge.

[Clandestino]

I'm not saying we're using terror. I'm saying that your defenition of terrorism does not apply in this scenario.

It's so hard for you to step outside of your United States box. You believe that we're the most noble country on earth, and you believe everything we do militarly has a noble motive.

Yet, I'm the one who's blind?

Dude, I haven't even tried to insult you once in this thread, I tried to keep the discussion very simple, and you resort to..



You're right about one thing, I obviously should find something better to do.

manny, you're the one who has never been outside the box.. you have lived in the u.s. your whole life.. i have lived and worked in many countries...everything you say is something you read.. you have never experienced anything.. all you ideas are not yours.. they are just regurgitations of someone else experiences... get outside the box boy..

[MannyIsGod]

Fair enough, I'm off to experience the world. Catch you on the flipside, jack.

[Useruser666]

I would think that you would be able to define terrorism Chris. I can define vandlism, it's not very hard.

Vandlism would simply be the destruction or defacing of someone elses property without consent. Anyone commiting said act would then be a vandle.

That's not vauge.

Your exapmle was vague. I was trying to point that out to you by listing another vague example.

Someone could write on a wall and not be a vandal. It could be their wall, they could be an artist who is paid to draw on the wall, or simply have the owner's permission.

The shooting of an army soldier may not be terrorism. If you mean to use the example in the article posted at the top of this thread, then I would say yes that is terrorism.

[Sec24Row7]

You do not teach yourself how to use Dope on a scope at 1200 meters by playing video games.

Story = BS.

[Clandestino]

You do not teach yourself how to use Dope on a scope at 1200 meters by playing video games.

Story = BS.

exactly... or by watching hollywood movies!

[MannyIsGod]

Your exapmle was vague. I was trying to point that out to you by listing another vague example.

Someone could write on a wall and not be a vandal. It could be their wall, they could be an artist who is paid to draw on the wall, or simply have the owner's permission.

WTF? Did you bother to read what I posted? Go back and read my defenition dude. I didn't say about writing on walls, that was YOUR example.

[MannyIsGod]

manny, you're the one who has never been outside the box.. you have lived in the u.s. your whole life.. i have lived and worked in many countries...everything you say is something you read.. you have never experienced anything.. all you ideas are not yours.. they are just regurgitations of someone else experiences... get outside the box boy..

You know what, I let this bull go earlier, but I'm not going to to now.

You can't refute I say on a factual level. Anytime you come up with an arguement, it turns out to be based on nothing more than opinion. You claim that I'm the one who is regurgitating ideas yet you are the one who offers up nothing but generic american labled .

You tried to ing lecture me on what to do on MLK day at the march even though YOU'VE NEVER GONE TO A MARCH AND YOU HAVE VERY LITTLE UNDERSTANDING WHAT MLK ACTUALLY STOOD FOR. And then you have the nerve to turn around and tell me I've never experienced things?

off man. You haven't yet been able to counter what I say with an observation made on facts. You don't know on what I've been exposed to.

You're quick to point to the experience card when it's supposubly in your favor. And how much it's in your favor I'm not exactly sure. Serving in the military is not equitable to serving in the military in a time of war and serving in an actual warzone. Nor is ecquitable to being in a country that is invaded.

So for all of your experiences why aren't you able to base your arguements on facts?

[Useruser666]

WTF? Did you bother to read what I posted? Go back and read my defenition dude. I didn't say about writing on walls, that was YOUR example.

Damnit Manny! I know that was my example. ing A! Don't you read my posts at all? I said I gave that example of writing on walls because it was vague like your example. I was trying to point out to you that I need more specifics to answer your question.

Your example:

Very well, then define terrorism. Is the shooting of an army soldier terrorism?

If you are talking about the shooting of a US soldier in a WWII battle, then no, that's not terrorism.

If you are talking about the shooting of a US soldier by an insurgent in Iraq right now, then yes, that's terrorism.

[Clandestino]

You know what, I let this bull go earlier, but I'm not going to to now.

You can't refute I say on a factual level. Anytime you come up with an arguement, it turns out to be based on nothing more than opinion. You claim that I'm the one who is regurgitating ideas yet you are the one who offers up nothing but generic american labled .

You tried to ing lecture me on what to do on MLK day at the march even though YOU'VE NEVER GONE TO A MARCH AND YOU HAVE VERY LITTLE UNDERSTANDING WHAT MLK ACTUALLY STOOD FOR. And then you have the nerve to turn around and tell me I've never experienced things?

off man. You haven't yet been able to counter what I say with an observation made on facts. You don't know on what I've been exposed to.

You're quick to point to the experience card when it's supposubly in your favor. And how much it's in your favor I'm not exactly sure. Serving in the military is not equitable to serving in the military in a time of war and serving in an actual warzone. Nor is ecquitable to being in a country that is invaded.

So for all of your experiences why aren't you able to base your arguements on facts?

right here, we're talking about this guy and him being a terrorist...you try to come up with clintonesque answers, "what is the definition of a terrorist?"

stfu and you have no idea when i served, where i served, how i served... remember this isnt the first war we've had... p.s. i was also a defense contractor overseas...became a resident of that country... i truly know what foreigners think of us, not just what i read on the internet...

and i do know you have never even gone overseas to places you act like you know so much about... i bet you haven't even left texas before. also, you were the one telling me about "being outside the box."

[JoeChalupa]

He needs to be taken out.