Reply With Quote
Actually, there was another deal which was difficult to pull off. With the shooters on the Lakers, you may try to tinker with it and get Andre Miller from Philly.
Luke is like the Spur's Bonner, everybody wants to trade 'em but nobody wants them. In the meantime, both guys play decent ball in stretches.
I don't make Luke trade proposals because he's pretty much "untouchable" in a bad way.
Bonner's off his high lately but of late, Luke's been earning his contract and has played well as a Laker starter. Radman seems to be out of the rotation and in Phil's doghouse.
Actually, there was another deal which was difficult to pull off. With the shooters on the Lakers, you may try to tinker with it and get Andre Miller from Philly.
The Sixers haven't thrown in the towel on the season yet, I don't think they'd be willing to part with their only point guard.
If Fisher, Sasha and Rad are not enough, what is enough?
As most Mav fans would tell you, a lateral trade for Howard, so long as it's for a guy who would give a about playing basketball, would put us in the elite category.
What are the Mavs' needs?
For someone to be the focus of the other team's defense besides him so he can just play with having to carry the team.
Everything Josh Howard is not.
Is that even serious?
They would not trade Fisher, and that trade does nothing for Philly. No one is taking Radman or Vuja 's contract I don't care how good Laker fans say they are.
Philly is not in the race for 2010.
As a rockets fan, I have dreamt more than once that Tmac was traded to cleverland for Ben wallace. It's more ideal to trade him to ATL for JJ than trading him to Cleverland for Ben, but why the should the hawks even think about making such a deal with the rockets. Tmac is always a cancer wherever he is, as I commented just now.
Tmac for JJohnson happens only in dreams.
It'll have to be a gamble that the Hawks would be willing to take (as far as injury to T Mac) but remember those guys passed on Chris Paul in the draft and they needed a PG for yet another Small forward, which they were crowded with. T Mac to ATL is doable if they want another SF, lol.As a rockets fan, I have dreamt more than once that Tmac was traded to cleverland for Ben wallace. It's more ideal to trade him to ATL for JJ than trading him to Cleverland for Ben, but why the should the hawks even think about making such a deal with the rockets. Tmac is always a cancer wherever he is, as I commented just now.
Tmac for JJohnson happens only in dreams.
Besides the Mavs and Knicks (for the purpose of 2010), I don't see anyone taking in T-Mac.
I was going to make a long post, but will summarize main points. This season and last, there are about 10 contenders for the le. Since only one le goes out per season, most big trades won't work out, look at all the ones made last year that never will.
A team has to decide if the trade might get them a le now, or set them up for the future. Some teams mortgage the future for a shot now. We know who all these teams are. Before you support a trade for your favorite team, try to figure out what the result could be. At least we don't have to serve as the GM and risk our job over team performance.
Who cares? They still wouldn't take Vujacic or Radman. It has nothing to do with 2010 they have no reason to trade for either one.
JJ is probably one of the least likely players to be traded right now. I agree.Tmac for JJohnson happens only in dreams.
JJ is a top 3 SG, right behind Kobe and Wade.
They need to surround Brand with shooters, the reason why Philly is losing is because of the lack of shooters that result in missed shots.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
