Who's the next Steve Nash ?

[DUNCANownsKOBE2]

who cares? im just kidding dragic.

[romain.star]

There it is. No les to his credit. No FINALS MVP awards. But damn, he's entertaining.

Hey, since i'm a spurs fan, i'm ok with Nash being an entertaining loser. That's actually what i like about him.

[kace]

I don't get the spurs fans concerning Nash.

The guy might be an ''all offense, no defense"" PG but still, he is (was?) a great player, very entertaining.
Also, he has a great mindset and seems to be a nice fella off the court.
As for his two MVP awards, the jury is to be blamed, not him.

Plus he always loses against us so... why so serious?

once again, the article is not only about nash but also about the significance of having a PG who shot at a high %, with a list of the best examples including Tony. That's the reason why i brought this article here but i was too lazy to change the le. so, it's not really and only about Nash.

[TicketCity]

Devin Harris is the next Steve nash, imo

[I Love Me Some Me]

I'm telling you...LUKE RIDNOUR. Similar game, athleticism, intelligence, and their career arcs (to this point) are striking similar.

If Ridnour played in run and gun like Nash did in Dallas then Phoenix, he'd be the exact same player Nash was.

[mathbzh]

once again, the article is not only about nash but also about the significance of having a PG who shot at a high %, with a list of the best examples including Tony. That's the reason why i brought this article here but i was too lazy to change the le. so, it's not really and only about Nash.

So the answer is... any modern PG.
So far, there are 14 PG shooting over 45% this season, 12 last year.
From 2000 to 2007 they were 5 to 7.
I believe the PG role is changing. And I think Tony is one of the responsible for this. Despite not being a great shooter he was able to bring high% scoring.
I think this had an impact on all the young PG.