Reply With Quote
Uh, look again.
I'll bet the people who predicted WTC 7 would collapse also predicted WTC 3, WTC 4, WTC 5, and WTC 6 would collapse?WTC 3's collapse didn't need to be predicted since both north and south towers fell directly on top of it.
Before:
After the south tower collapse:
After the north tower collapse:
Building 4? Same story:
Buildings 5 and 6 had massive damage from debris from the north tower, and both burned quite fiercely after that collapse, and experienced partial internal collapses themselves. They did not totally collapse, but they were not constructed with 40+ floors over a Con Ed substation like WTC 7.
Building 5:
Building 6:
Authorities did not predict the collapse of the St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church either.
So obviously Bartholomew I is the mastermind behind 9/11.
They'd be wrong, none collapsed.
Uh, look again.
OH MY GOD, SOMEONE PREDICTED A BUILDING WITH MULTIPLE FIRES AND OBVIOUS EXTERNAL DAMAGE MIGHT COLLAPSE!!!
IT MUST PROVE AN EVIL CONSPIRACY TO BLOW IT UP.
BEEFCAKE!!
And your point is...?
I did look.
Oh, by the way, no steel was recovered from WTC 3, WTC 4, WTC 5, or WTC 6.
We can recover items from the South Pole and top of Mount Everest.
We can recover items from the middle of the Sahara Desert and from the Moon.
But not steel beams from downtown Manhattan.
Just like you can't get your head out of your ass.
So let me get this straight: No one would reply to your ty threads about Galileo so you went back to the WTC thing again?
I'll bet I could have found the giant steel beams at ground zero.
And you are still trying to say that WTC did not collapse.
If you think the death of 3000 people is humor, then your humor missed.
I think intelligence missed you too.
The elephant in the room...
The bull in the thread....
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
