Reply With QuoteYou want a rivalry don't you?
i was pissed seeing all the players help the opposing teams players off the ground.....
should a "thankyou" card be sent as well?
it's football gotdamnit. HATED rivals. Get it?
There is no love loss betw these two...Gibbs did the obligatory handshake(a lot of coachs do not even do that)...Gibbs was pissed at the ass reeming he got from the refs, he was pissed at himself for not saving the timeout which would have tied the game, had he had it...give the man a break, for God's sake.
You want a rivalry don't you?
i was pissed seeing all the players help the opposing teams players off the ground.....
should a "thankyou" card be sent as well?
it's football gotdamnit. HATED rivals. Get it?
Jim...I gave the guy a break. I said he deserved one but you are too stupid and too busy acting like a disgruntled schoolgirl who got turned down for an autograph by her favorite member of her favorite boy band to notice the sportsmanship. For all your good points bro, your lack of sportsmanship and objectivity glows all too brightly.
I still think "hate" is too strong of a word to be used in sports. It is just a game.
this though, I agree with...handshakes are for after the game...not during.i was pissed seeing all the players help the opposing teams players off the ground.....
Mikey, was I talking to you?????
If you were not...you would have acknowledged my post agreeing with you.
Mikey, check out the posts that were talking about Gibbs' lack of sportsmanship and get back to me on that.
Ok Jim...for you, I will t y p e s l o w l y...Not surprisingly Jim, you missed my point. I was defending Joe Gibbs. I disagreed with him being called unsportsmanlike. That was my original point and also my point to you. I didn't think Gibbs was being unsportsmanlike. Try and shake off the bias and realize not everyone is against you.
You don't need a quick cuddle "afterwards", Joe?
Nope. I'm good. Leave the money on the dresser.
I don't blame Gibbs for being upset. He is always been an intense guy. Nothing wrong with that. I thought he should have given more of a handshake but he has too good of a track record in the game for something like that to be an issue. It's not like he pulled a Buddy Ryan.
[/foreskins]
Mikey, I did not miss your point, I was not talking to YOU at all when I said to give Gibbs a break...
DO You Understand the words coming out of my mouth!!!???
You operate your keyboard with your mouth? Weird, even for you, Jim.DO You Understand the words coming out of my mouth!!!???
Man, nobody understand the words comin' outta your mouth! :p
That is not nice exstatic, you know I am a quadraplegic...damn, you are cold.You operate your keyboard with your mouth? Weird, even for you, Jim.
Jim,
I agree those were two horrible calls, but to say they were the outcome of the game would've been in favor of the Reds is really hard to say.
They were early in the game and to early to determine the outcome. Sure the first one would've neglected Dallas first score, but the game would've played out differently if it would've been a no call. Lets say there's no score and the Redskins get the call on Newman. What's to say they woul've scored, they couldn't score from the goaline on the one before.
What about the blotched call on Portis being down by contact, which resulted in the Reds marching down and scoring again. Fact is Dallas wouldn't of been playing soft and conservative if they were trailing with their last two possesions.
Score board, Dallas Wins and the Redskins are still Dallas's es.
Save your words JC ...it's only about the missed calls against the skins and not against the Cowboys...also the settling for 3 rather than 7 when the skins had the ball 1st and goal is moot. It's all about the refs.
Roy Williams is a bad mutha.
Easily my favorite player on the Cowboys
helmet to helmet....15 yards....what? no flag...ooookay. :p
Just another of many calls that the Redskins got reemed on Zak.
Actually once the reciever catches the ball, he becomes a runner and helmet to helmet is legal.
Actually once the reciever catches the ball, he becomes a runner and helmet to helmet is legal.
They actually made that announcement on the telecast, gentlemen.
Also on Sportscenter, Sean Salisbury was breaking down the game and metioned it also. Williams is a stud and even Redskins fans would love to have him on their team. IMO, they have the next one in Sean Taylor.
Don't confuse them with facts, dude. They want to wallow in their misery. Let them.Actually once the reciever catches the ball, he becomes a runner and helmet to helmet is legal.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
