Actually I was thinking more about the opponent TO. And not specifically about the Spurs (Spurs don't force a lot of TO).
All the champs since the Jordan era have had winning records on the road. Not sure about before that.
Actually I was thinking more about the opponent TO. And not specifically about the Spurs (Spurs don't force a lot of TO).
This is not only a matter of pace. Portland has the lower pace in the NBA but is fouling more than SA.
I don't see what you mean.- No question about 3 point shooting.
Portland doesn't have SA's rep. Plus they are young overall and aren't going to get the same call a vet does.
In regards to 3 point shooting, I thought you meant SA does well in that cat - which I agree. If you meant where SA is defensively - its not surprising considering whose defending the perimeter.
You need to look at all the stats if you want to start breaking down specific categories where the spurs rank. How are they compared in easy points off transistion turnovers or points inside the paint area or total possessions, ect. The spurs will not fair well in those areas so crunching down on a few selective stats is worthless without considering everything.
This is exactly my point![]()
Somewhat agreed. But he's the best at preaching about officials inbetween games and that has won him as many games as shaq and kobe.
I'm not sure, but I think you missed my point. I am saying that they have already improved past where their 9th place indicates. In order for them to have been able to average up from (I believe it was) 27th in the league after about 15-20 games, and to average up from 17th in the league in mid january, they have to have been playing at a level that is substantially higher than the 9th place indicates. Look at it this way, if the spurs had started out 3-17 to have the 27th best record in the league after 20 games, they have to play win more than the 1st place team (or second, or third) out of their next 40 games in order to make it to 9th place in the league after 60 games. Meanwhile, (and I could be wrong on this) I believe the lakers have been anywhere from 4th-6th all year long. This means that they have played at about the same level (never last, never first) for any meaningful stretch of games. I guess what it boils down to is, compare the last 20 games (I would think this is a large enough sample, but you may disagree) for the teams to get a true comparison of where each team is at right now for this particular statistic.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)