Yeah... Legler also said Garnett blocked Tim's shot and that the ball was not near the cylinder...
Tim was trying to tell the refs that Garnett blocked it only after the ball had started its descent...
Legler completely misread that play....
^^ exactly.
But suspend Duncan, and Beno.
Such troublemakers.
Classic coming from a fan of a team with a face like Latrell Sprewell.
Yeah... Legler also said Garnett blocked Tim's shot and that the ball was not near the cylinder...
Tim was trying to tell the refs that Garnett blocked it only after the ball had started its descent...
Legler completely misread that play....
If anything, it's like the incident in Dallas during the 2003 WCF where David Robinson stepped on the floor during a little fracas. Some thought David would be suspended for that and it turned out to be nothing. It's incidental.
If the league suspends Duncan for that, it's being awfully petty.
I liked the fact the entire bench freaked out at that foul.
I doubt there'll be any suspensions -- if there is, who cares? The Slovenian Playboy guys probably want to see more of Rasho vs. Brezec anyway.
I agree, last night the Spurs showed toughness. They are there for each other, they take offense at hard fouls, they really got into the defense, (I thought TP was outstanding) and put to rest any bull about being soft. They manhandled that team.
The problem isn't whether he stood up off the bench. It is whether he was on the court or not. A player from the bench is not allowed to be on the court. I was watching the game on ESPN and when they showed the replay, it looked awfully close. And it didn't look like he was just going to see if udrih was okay. He was ticked. I don't know if he will be suspended or not, but it is possible.
True, but that was the same problem that existed with David's incident in 2003. David had actually taken at least one step onto the floor and was pulled back by a teammate. But David wasn't suspended. I can't see why Tim would be if he showed no sign of making an effort to become involved in the "fracas." I can see why some would want Tim suspended, and I can't say I'd dispute a decision by which Tim was suspended, but I also don't think that it necessarily must follow that Tim must be suspended.
Not to make this post long, but I agreewith you From..., I was just saying that technically he could be suspended. Not that he probably will. But if the league happens to review it. They would be within their right to give him a game suspension.
what 1/82 of Tim's salary this year?
He wont get suspened....I highly doubt it.
There's no chance in that tim is gonna get suspended for that...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)