New York didn't shove anything up anyone's ass. Tim Duncan's injury and Manu's rust, however did.My point just got shoved up your ass by the New York Knicks.
And if you say that's an excuse, well you can shove that up your ass. I'd love to see NY win against a good DIII college team without Starbury, or Miami without Shaq, or Cleveland without LeBron.
Kurt Thomas didn't play tonight...
C'mon...they started ole turnover prone Malik...that should have worked in our favor right? I mean he held us back right?
and hey...what's our record now with Duncan out...Manu playing, compared to last season when Malik in filled in for him...with meaningless 20 20 games and leading the NBA in FTA.
Your actually sticking with that Whottt??
Pathetic.
Served again.And if you say that's an excuse, well you can shove that up your ass. I'd love to see NY win against a good DIII college team without Starbury, or Miami without Shaq, or Cleveland without LeBron.
Knicks were without Kurt Thomas, their starting C...and they are beat up too...
Oh no...but wait...Isiah Thomas is an idiot remember? Your scouting buddy had it all figured it out...he's an idiot that now has a better record than us since doing those trades.
whottt you are an idiot, the knicks still suck total ass, malik or not. but i guess their incredible 7-4 record since trading for malik makes them a beast in the east. 8-5 by the spurs is way worse than that!
Nazr's first back to back game, comes back against a team that he played well for, and you dont see that coming??
Maybe he was GASP HUMAN AND WAS NERVOUS.
I know, being human on this forum is foreign to Nazr haters.
if Nazr went 6 for 18 Whottt would be starting another,
where are the Nazr> wilt threads bull .
Dude, it was one ing game. You talk about Malik like he was some kind of poor man's Wilt Chamberlainmeaningless 20 20 games
Manu proved last year he could carry the team with Tony and Tim out. It's obvious the last two games Manu is still rusty/hurt, but you gloss over that because you want to pump up the importance of Malik.
I feel ya.
Tell ya what: let's come back and talk in June and compare notes. You win if Malik and the Knicks got further than the Spurs.
so kurt Thomas and Penny Hardaway = Tim Duncan??Knicks were without Kurt Thomas, their starting C...and they are beat up too...
Wow, thats a new one.
Served? Served?
Our team got served.
Whott you would have a point if the center position was incredibly important, but it's not. Marbury makes that team go. He had 31 tonight. Marbury gets off, the Knicks are tough to beat.
Rose was 6-18 tonight, he just took away some of Crawford's bricks for his own.
If Manu was even close to being 80% this is a much different game.
I don't know how many times tonight manu pulled up and passed, and didn't drive the lane.
That folks is a rusty/injured Ginobili.
A healthy Ginobili goes for 30 tonight easily.
Let me get a word in here......
Rasho, Malik, Nazr, Marks and Massenburg, have to be the worst group of assembled big men in the history of basketball. Created by Popovich.
Without Duncan, their balance of talent falls off the cliff.
Late.
Aggie...if I were you and picNroll I would go and edit those comments where you guys claimed Mohammed has a J....
Because you guys aint got a ing clue what you are talking about and you will embarrassed if you don't back away from that stance...that thing is the ugliest thing I have ever seen in my entire life.
I will reiterate.Rose was 6-18 tonight,
If Nazr Mohammed shot that, Whottt, Timvp, and everyone else, would be calling for his head, and having him cut immediately.
The Knicks are a 26 win team...and according to you guys we raped them of their best player...they were playing without their best big...and we can't beat them without Tim Duncan?
Sorry that is an excuse.
Only because he shouldn't be taking 18 shots off the bench.I will reiterate.
If Nazr Mohammed shot that, Whottt, Timvp, and everyone else, would be calling for his head, and having him cut immediately.
If he was a starter and was still productive (boards, blocks, getting to the line) no one would care if he was 6-for-18.
Yeah cause Malik had a Bernard King esque jumper out there tonight right.hat thing is the ugliest thing I have ever seen in my entire life.
in all respect Kori, Bull .no one would care if he was 6-for-18.
There would be THOUSANDS of threads calling for his in head.
If Malik does it?? hes fantatsic.
The hypocrisy knows no ends.
Malik's J looks like Ray Allen compard to Mohammeds...that damn thing of his looks like it could kills someone if it hit them...have you actually watched this guy take a J?
It comes out of his hands going about 175 MPH.......that aint something that stays with you for 8 years because of coaching.
Wanna show us where we said that??we raped them of their best player
No one said Nazr Mohammed was there best player.
Only in your Coyote > David Robinson brain did that come up.
lol I am the last defender of Brent Barry and now you tell me I would trash a guy over his PCT?
Wrong.
My trashing of Mohammed's J has nothing to do with his PCT...and everything to do with the fact that he doesn't have one and homers were claiming he did because he made one freaking shot.
hat aint something that stays with you for 8 years because of coaching.
So now Mohammed has had good coaching in his 8 years in the league????
Fantastic.
I'd say Nazr was about the fourth best player on the Knicks (Marbury, Crawford, KThomas). He was their best center, and one of the better ones in the league (still is).
It takes other guys entire seasons to "get" the Spurs system, and yet we have one clown (whott) railing on the guy for not getting it all in 8 games. Go figure.
Oh horse .
If Mohammed shot 6-18 youd say
Malik never shot that much, Malik knew when to stop, malik malik malik malik.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
