Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 36 of 36
  1. #26
    Pimp Marcus Bryant's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Post Count
    1,021,992
    "So you want the FCC to enforce your set of beliefs"

    I didn't say that, you did. How does anyone enforce any "mores".

    What the does freedom of speech have to do with mores?

    Mores as they relate to speech, dumbass.

  2. #27
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    cherry-picking your mores. Which other ones do want "society" to enforce/not enforce?

  3. #28
    Pimp Marcus Bryant's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Post Count
    1,021,992
    cherry-picking your mores. Which other ones do want "society" to enforce/not enforce?
    Yeah, who needs to stay on topic?

    Further, who cares so long as you are free to live your life as you see fit? Of course, if you didn't have anything to about you'd probably off your miserable ass ASAP.

    So we either have freedom, or we have croutons' arbitrary moral standards which are subject to the whims of whoever is in power; no real freedom whatsoever.

  4. #29
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,976
    Sure, but it would seem that the Court has concluded that the State has articulated at least a colorable interest in preventing obscenity.
    *Color*( as you surely know, FWD; ST may not) is one of the great weasel words in law.

    E.g., http://www.lectlaw.com/def/c252.htm

    Also, http://definitions.uslegal.com/c/color-of-law/

    Or more generically, http://www.lectlaw.com/def2/u001.htm

    From West's, http://www.answers.com/topic/colorable


    Generally, colorability refers to some contrived pretext for an unjust plea.

  5. #30
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,976
    Sometimes legal color carries the day. In this way, bull acquires a patina of respectability.

  6. #31
    Live by what you Speak. DarkReign's Avatar
    My Team
    Detroit Pistons
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    10,571
    Sometimes legal color carries the day. In this way, bull acquires a patina of respectability.


    Well said.

  7. #32
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    "we have croutons' arbitrary moral standards which are subject to the whims of whoever is in power; no real freedom whatsoever."

    With all due respect, you're ing stupid.

    Nobody has answered how "society" (not the govt) is going to set and enforce "mores".

  8. #33
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,976
    Nobody has answered how "society" (not the govt) is going to set and enforce "mores".
    It already does. Freedom of association, home raising, peer pressure, letter writing, boycott, protest etc..

  9. #34
    Get Refuel! FromWayDowntown's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Post Count
    19,921
    Generally, colorability refers to some contrived pretext for an unjust plea.
    I use it more in the sense of plausibility, but I understand your point. By suggesting that the FCC may have articulated a colorable basis to support enforcement of the regulations prohibiting obscenity, I'm not in any way suggesting that I agree with it or a judicial finding to that effect -- or that it should be given credence at all.

    Just to be clear . . . .

  10. #35
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,976
    I use it more in the sense of plausibility, but I understand your point. By suggesting that the FCC may have articulated a colorable basis to support enforcement of the regulations prohibiting obscenity, I'm not in any way suggesting that I agree with it or a judicial finding to that effect -- or that it should be given credence at all.

    Just to be clear . . . .
    It was, and you were. The pedant in me couldn't resist glossing the word. Once it was considered a perversion of justice, but long usage has made it a synonym for *plausible*.

  11. #36
    Pimp Marcus Bryant's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Post Count
    1,021,992
    "we have croutons' arbitrary moral standards which are subject to the whims of whoever is in power; no real freedom whatsoever."

    With all due respect, you're ing stupid.

    Nobody has answered how "society" (not the govt) is going to set and enforce "mores".
    yawn. You stupid . And gee, might most people change the channel when Hagee comes on? In any event, you are free not to watch. Cut your throat already.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •