Kenyon Martin is a good player, Nets haven't been able to find anyone near as good as him since he left.
Sad thing is Kidd made Sean Williams look good
"Umm, No"
Also, lol at the Martin comment and lol at the Nuggets for giving up 3 future 1st rounders whilst picking up that re ed contract, thinking they were going to get a great player instead receiving fools gold. you Kiki, 1 of the worst gm's alive.
Kidd > Iverson
If you had to pick between Kidd and Iverson to start a franchise with (if both were younger and the same age), only a re , homer, or a combination of both would pick Iverson.
three future 1st rounders that helpped Nets get Vince Carter, and I wouldn't say Kiki is the worst, but not the best either him and Rod Thorn have been good together
"Umm, No"
Also, lol at the Martin comment and lol at the Nuggets for giving up 3 future 1st rounders whilst picking up that re ed contract, thinking they were going to get a great player instead receiving fools gold. you Kiki, 1 of the worst gm's alive.
I'd pick AI in a one on one game with Kidd, but the NBA is a team sport. Kidd >>>>>>>>>>>> AI.
Only players in that list ever deserve a championship is Miller and Stockton but even Miller is a question because he never play defense. The rest of them all have something wrong with playing winner's basketball.
Nobody "deserves" a championship if they don't win it on the floor. Barkley's probably the best of that group, and it's a shame that he didn't win a le. Jim Paxson stole it from him.
He never play defense ever in his whole career. He is not deserving of a championship.
Yeah, he's much, much better. He took the Nets, the Nets!, to two NBA finals.That wife beater ain't no where near AI's level.
"Hi honey"
I think Nowitzki will win a ring eventually. Whether or not it's with the Dallas Mavericks is anyone's guess.
Ewing didn't play. Semantics and all.Uh.. who did the Spurs play against in their first Finals?
Nate was pretty damn good, and definitely a far better rebounder and defensive player than Dirk. Not as good a scorer. I'd say they
re about equal but I'd take Nate over Dirk.
Who gives a pile of horse about who the better player is to build around. Quite frankly, seeing how both failed to win a ring, they're both equally worthless in that aspect. AI is the better player overall and only a homer like you would argue otherwise. Me=2 You=0
It speaks volumes about who's the better player, dumbass. And it's hard to see where Iverson is the better overall player. The only thing he does better is score.Who gives a pile of horse about who the better player is to build around. Quite frankly, seeing how both failed to win a ring, they're both equally worthless in that aspect. AI is the better player overall and only a homer like you would argue otherwise. Me=2 You=0
Overall, you don't see AI as the better player? U trippin'. I think you have the words mixed up, I said Overall, not All around. Me= 3 U=0
JJ Barae could have taken the nets to the finals in the east back then.
What about Mutombo?
LMAO Mavs
no he couldn't of, Kidd was prefect for those two teams back then they all just clicked. Martin, Kidd, Jefferson, Kittles, and all the rest were awesome back then, not saying they aren't all awesome now. But back then they just were one of the best teams together
^ this
Anyone who watched him play defense on David Robinson for years will disagree with you on that point.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
