Did Gooden do enough?

[FaithInOne]

HE'S A POST WHO CAN POST UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

That's a GD rarity for the Spurs!

[SouthTexasRancher]

Do you think Gooden did enough in the limited games he played to convince the FO to throw some serious money at him?

I think we all saw where Gooden fits into Pop's plans. He was head cheerleader in Pop's Dog House come playoff time. I don't know what some of the better players to come along do that gets them in trouble with Pop but, something happens. Usually these players go on to another team and don't end up doing much.

On the other hand some seem to do very well in another system. I'm afraid next season will be more of this past season because of the contract situations. The trouble is the big name players in 2010 that will be Free Agents will end up going to bigger markets that have owners with ego's as big as the Pacific ocean.

Since Pop has coached us to 4 NBA Championships and along with RC Buford, been instrumental in bringing us quality players like Tony & Manu to name two, I have faith they will do the right thing for the team and try to get us Trophy #5 while Tim is still playing. And I do think Pop and RC are very aware we need to get younger, more athletic, taller, longer and learn to play lockdown Defense again. JMHO

[Ditty]

i would hope that bonner would be traded so we could sign gooden for 1 year worth like 2 million what bonners contract is worth we cant give him a good contract without truly proving himself but i think if we get a big man this offseason gooden could take alot of offense off tim when tim goes tot he bench

[Agloco]

Gooden came in with a reputation as a player with good offensive talent, who could rebound, but was kind of clueless on how to play within a team system. He also was known as a knucklehead.

While he behaved himself as a Spur, his play was that of a player with good offensive talent, who rebounded, but was clueless on how to play within a team system. He was a black hole when he got the ball, and had zero concept of team defense. I don't think this was because he was unwilling; he really seemed to want to fit in, but it just doesn't seem like he's smart enough to "get it."

When the Spurs signed Gooden, to several observers around the country it looked like a sign of desperation from a team totally depleted in talent around its big 3. Based upon the result of the season, I would say those observers were correct. It goes to show just what a steaming pile of dog the roster was that 1) Gooden looked like a real improvement, 2) Spurs fans' perception of talent has been recalibrated so that he seems like he could be a major contributor going forward.

In sum, Gooden has a place in an NBA rotation as a journeyman big man, but not as a guy who gets lots of money thrown at him. That he even has a place in an NBA rotation is more than can be said for the likes of Matt Bonner or Fabricio Oberto at this point.

P.S. R.C. Buford sucks at his job and should be fired.

/thread

[Yuixafun]

They need to put his ass on the stairmaster, every time they showed a close up of him running his bottom lip and jaw were jiggling and he made running up and down the court look like hard work

Vivid.

No more jalisco's tacos for Drew.

[hater]

Gooden was the 3rd most talented player in the team instantly. by far

[austinwn7]

i think he did better than Kurt Thomas. Kurt Thomas has been a dump. I think Gooden will get better as he learns the system this summer in training camp.

[Galileo]

Keep Gooden. He is an above average big man and very talented. He needs to work on his passing, defense, and off ball movement.

He can learn this from Pop and Tim Duncan.

Gooden is the best talent to play next to Duncan since D-Rob got old.

He is 6'10", strong, a # 4 pick, sandwiched inside 1st team all-American & 1st team all-Rookie seasons. He started for a team that went to the NBA finals.

He is a very good rebounder and has scored double digits every year of his career. Last season was his best ever for points per minute.

[spurspokesman]

The Gooden situation IS indeed an interesting one.

On one hand, I believe we saw flashes of what he could be and how he could help the Spurs. Though he's not the greatest low-post defender in the world, he can create his own shot and is big and phsyical. I don't get too caught up in the whole "black hole" thing because I trust that Pop could "coach" that part out of his game. The bottom line is he definitely adds value, especially from a low-post scoring and rebounding perspective. The mere fact that the Spurs do not have another viable option, like him, on the roster makes it worth looking at him again. The Spurs would be foolish to simply let him walk without so much as a possible negotiation discussion. As such, I wouldn't mind seeing him back at a reasonable, short-term deal.

On the other hand, if the Spurs are able to nab a guy like Marcin Gortat (Orlando), via free agency, then that acquisition would make Gooden expendable.

. Despite what everybody thinks this guy looked like an all star out there this year compared to the trash we had of A team. He at least made it interesting. If martin gortat doesn't show he definetely deserves A look. Finally A big who can SCORE. Defense doesn't win championships if you can't SCORE. He can work on his D but he is offensively superior to 75% of our roster. PERIOD. Believe it or not he's A diamond in the ruff. Just needs A little teaching. Im for the Drew dog.

[Extra Stout]

Gooden was the 3rd most talented player in the team instantly. by far

This should be stickied to the forum somewhere. This should be Exhibit A for why R.C. Buford needs to be ridden out of town on a rail.

A player that a 17-65 Sacramento Kings team couldn't wait to get rid of instantly became the third-best player on a team that thought it was going to win something.

[JustinJDW]

I liked Gooden, and I don't understand why everyone gave him a hard time. I want the Spurs to resign him, but I doubt they will. Next Season, I would love for our Big Man Lineup to be something like this.

Center - Drew Gooden/Ian Mahinmi
Power Forward - Tim Duncan/Matt Bonner or James Gist or Draft Pick

[trajik dark]

I liked Gooden, and I don't understand why everyone gave him a hard time. I want the Spurs to resign him, but I doubt they will. Next Season, I would love for our Big Man Lineup to be something like this.

Center - Drew Gooden/Ian Mahinmi
Power Forward - Tim Duncan/Matt Bonner or James Gist or Draft Pick

he want be back when our back was against the wall pop knew we needed offense and still kept good on the bench i feel if we would have went wit parker,hill,bowen,good,and duncan as the starters against dallas in game 4 our chances would have been better

[Obstructed_View]

This should be stickied to the forum somewhere. This should be Exhibit A for why R.C. Buford needs to be ridden out of town on a rail.

A player that a 17-65 Sacramento Kings team couldn't wait to get rid of instantly became the third-best player on a team that thought it was going to win something.

You might be able to fool yourself into thinking Sacramento wasn't counting as many ping pong balls as dollars when they made that decision, but don't try to drag the rest of us into your delusion.

[SenorSpur]

With the depleted and talent-thin frontline the Spurs have, they are in no position to simply thumb their noses at the possibility of retaining a talented big like Gooden. As someone pointed out earlier, they courted him to and back. When the got him, Pop played him sparingly in the playoffs. How the do you evaluate a guy if he can't get enough PT the learn the offense and show what he can do?

Everyone knows the Spurs are traditionally a fiscally-conscious group. Free agents are beating down the door to get to S.A. The margin for error is very slim. Yet, here's a guy that is a serviceable low psot option and decent rebounding big at both ends and I believe the Spurs will let him walk. It smacks again of the organizational arrogance that the Spurs FO occasionally tends to display.

Say what you will about Gooden, but he is a proven commodity in the NBA and is clearly was the 2nd best big on the roster.

[Mel_13]

The margin for error is very slim. Yet, here's a guy that is a serviceable low psot option and decent rebounding big at both ends and I believe the Spurs will let him walk. It smacks again of the organizational arrogance that the Spurs FO occasionally tends to display.

Say what you will about Gooden, but he is a proven commodity in the NBA and is clearly was the 2nd best big on the roster.

Do you believe he is the best player the Spurs could target with all or most of the MLE?

[venitian navigator]

I think that, before deciding about re- Signing Gooden, there are some answers we have to have about next year's choices.

1) are we gonna sign Splitter in 2010 and are we gonna stick with the 2010 plan ?
2) are we gonna trade Manu ?
3) are we gonna give Ian a fair chance to play along with Tim ?

The good points for resigning Gooden are :
Gooden is younger and more athletic than Wallace and Mc Dyess...if Tim is our staring center, given time to learn the system, he could be a good choice at a relatively good price (MLE) for the best years an athlete can give considering strenghts and experience (from 27 to 32)... let's not forget he's been a n° 4 choice in the draft (he's got talent to play at Duncan's spot for limited amount of time) and that he looked good with Manu in the limited time they played together.

[lefty]

Considering the minutes he's got, he's done more than enough IMHO

[Obstructed_View]

Spurs fans spend far too much time looking gift horses in the mouth. At some point you have to accept someone with talent, warts and all, especially if they are leaps and bounds above everyone else you've got on the radar, let alone on the roster.

[meestahmeestah]

Free agents are beating down the door to get to S.A.

Name a free agent with some tread left on the tires who beat down the door to get to S.A.

The ghost of Michael Finley doesn't count.