and by this i mean, trade ginobilli for the 5th pick who could very well be a superstar or atleast a borderline allstar, and then get ready to acquire chris bosh in 2010? which would then make it parker's team, inwhich we're set for another 5 years?
The reason why Pop talked about Manu is maybe because Harvey asked him to do so. I don't think there is something to read between the lines like Pop wanted to talk about Manu to send a message.
What Pop is saying is stronger than that. He said "I can't imagine a scenario where he would be traded.”
and by this i mean, trade ginobilli for the 5th pick who could very well be a superstar or atleast a borderline allstar, and then get ready to acquire chris bosh in 2010? which would then make it parker's team, inwhich we're set for another 5 years?
don't we have enough trade Manu for anything threads yet?
How many more trade Ginobili threads do we need??![]()
Not happening...the 5th pick would take up signifigant cap space for the 2010 bonanza.
This isnt even a thinking question for me.
YES!
Jaminson can play PF and Duncan C. When Duncan gets double teamed Jaminson will be right there. He would take alot of preasure off of Duncan. We also get a top 5 draft pick which is a 50/50 chance that the pick will be good but we don't have anything else to look foward to, lets take our chances.
Jamisons' contact is way too much.
Not suprised at all. This shows that the FO is taking the youth movement seriously. Besides, I think the Wizards want to win right now. I saw an article from Arenas. It looks something like "Either we get an immediate impactful person like Blake Griffin or we will move out of the draft."
Your idea is not bad, but I am not too sure of the immature players like Young.
more than one coach has probably thought that, but years later - he's still chucking 3s like he'll never see the ball again if he gives it up.
at this point, he is what he is.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)