Sheed could have been better but Dice is safer, and still very solid.
and with three NBA unproven players as Bigs (mahinmi, blair and haislip), it's not so bad to have a safer choice with Dice.
Personally I'm not saddened by this. All I can picture in my head is Sean's dagger over Sheed in '99, and Horry's in '05. I'd love to see RJ hitting the series deciding shot over him in '10.
Plus he strikes me as someone who might not quite have fit here. McDyess should have been Plan A from the start, IMO.
Sheed could have been better but Dice is safer, and still very solid.
and with three NBA unproven players as Bigs (mahinmi, blair and haislip), it's not so bad to have a safer choice with Dice.
Very nicely done.
what would he have against Richard Jefferson? They play the same position?
Wallace would have given the 2009-10 an extremely high ceiling. If Wallace is playing at a high level, he's a damn near perfect fit on the Spurs.
That said, McDyess is a much, much safer option. Wallace would have resulted in headaches for the coaches and worries for the fans. And with Wallace, there would have been a chance that the chemistry just didn't work out. McDyess doesn't come with that risk.
In other words, Wallace would be like investing in a volatile stock, while McDyess is like investing in a mutual fund.
The worst thing for an old vet who choose to play for a contender is being traded to a crappy team.
Maybe Sheed wasn't pleased to see that Spurs have traded Bruce and KT to Milwaukee and feared that they could also do it with him
Yeah, but why would Sheed think he'd be exempt from being traded in a few years from Boston?
It's gotta be Dice that does it. He went to Bama like Horry and his knees are jacked up like Sean's.
exactly!
he knew that if he came here, Bonner was going to show him up and take all his minutes.
smart man
Nice cover. Truthfully it was probably about the Spurs not willing to guarantee x amount of dollars for him.
I think many people thought the chance of getting rwallace was higher then dice. at least i did.
Sheed? Whozzat? Who the fugg cares?
2008-2009:
Double Doubles
Regular Season
Dice 16 (out of 62 games, 13 of 30 when starting)
Sheed 15 (out of 66 games, 15 out of 63 when starting)
Playoffs
Dice 1
Sheed 0
Wins Shares
Regular Season
Dice 5.3
Sheed 4.8
Playoffs
Dice 0.2
Sheed 0.0
PER
Regular Season
Dice 16.6
Sheed 14.9
Playoffs
Dice 14.8
Sheed 6.1 (one of the lowest in history)
http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/DET/2009.html
also note that in the 1995 NBA draft, Dice # 2 > Sheed # 3
Boston did what this off season outside of signing Sheed that impressed him?
"not enthused about some of the moves they made with their roster"
is code for:
"i'm really impressed how KG managed not to drag his teeth at all..."
+1
By and large SpurFan very defensive, making excuses.
He probably was
Wallace has on court basketball IQ. Not Basketball GM IQ.
Memorial Day Miracle 2.0 coming next June. Jefferson over Wallace. Or maybe Wallace leaves Duncan to guard Ginobili 2.0.
By and large you attack everything the Spurs do, making excuses.
I'm OK with 'sheed heading to Boston, he did what he thought was best for him. Would I rather him be in SA? Sure, but Dice isn't a bad consolation prize and is arguably a better fit for the Spurs.
He really said that?
I am happy he is not coming.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)