Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 28 of 28
  1. #26
    If you can't slam with the best then jam with the rest sabar's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    2,628
    Removing copyright law and trade secrets removes almost every monopoly

    Incentive remains as evidenced by open software and open standards in many industries.

    The only thing left is to heavily regulate mergers and buyouts. Price fixing becomes a non-issue in almost every market since there are no patents and secrets. That leaves a few industries like raw resource handling (oil,diamonds,food,etc) in which you just force splits so no one monopolizes the good.

    The problem is the government sucks at doing the most basic thing! Monopolies are allowed to exist (telecom, Microsoft, gas). The most basic regulation possible, that of busting up monopolies, isn't even done. Then the government goes and throws thousands of other regulations that drown out the free market (huge subsidies, bloated contracts, wildly overzealous safety standards in response to freak accidents, etc, etc).

    Meh, I wish I was dictator for a year so I could mess around and experiment with some real policy. I don't think anyone in DC actually knows what they are doing. We don't have a free market or a socialist one. It's some weird twisted market where the government enforces monopolies through overly long patents and copyright law, in which simple regulation isn't enforced, and where hundreds of little regulations drown small business and outsource industry.

    People can go on about economic theory all they want. We have a screwed up economy and no one knows what fixes it. People just implement policy until it reverses, and then claim after the fact that their policy fixed it. It's a viscous cycle, and I can't help but feel that we bleed money from inefficieny in our economy.

  2. #27
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Post Count
    460
    The real issue to me here is not necessarily regulation of markets. Its that we are spending on a ridiculous scale, with no thought as to how to actually pay for it. At least with WWII and the New Deal, that stuff for the most part got paid for by US citizens through war bonds and what not. Now, we say, " it, lets borrow from China, because they are super nice and would never think of calling in our debts at an inopportune time."

  3. #28
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    Removing copyright law and trade secrets removes almost every monopoly

    Incentive remains as evidenced by open software and open standards in many industries.

    The only thing left is to heavily regulate mergers and buyouts. Price fixing becomes a non-issue in almost every market since there are no patents and secrets. That leaves a few industries like raw resource handling (oil,diamonds,food,etc) in which you just force splits so no one monopolizes the good.

    The problem is the government sucks at doing the most basic thing! Monopolies are allowed to exist (telecom, Microsoft, gas). The most basic regulation possible, that of busting up monopolies, isn't even done. Then the government goes and throws thousands of other regulations that drown out the free market (huge subsidies, bloated contracts, wildly overzealous safety standards in response to freak accidents, etc, etc).

    Meh, I wish I was dictator for a year so I could mess around and experiment with some real policy. I don't think anyone in DC actually knows what they are doing. We don't have a free market or a socialist one. It's some weird twisted market where the government enforces monopolies through overly long patents and copyright law, in which simple regulation isn't enforced, and where hundreds of little regulations drown small business and outsource industry.

    People can go on about economic theory all they want. We have a screwed up economy and no one knows what fixes it. People just implement policy until it reverses, and then claim after the fact that their policy fixed it. It's a viscous cycle, and I can't help but feel that we bleed money from inefficieny in our economy.
    Well, that's the other extreme. I do think there's a middle ground somewhere. I'm not necessarily against the 8 year patent system. Seems a reasonable time to recoup your investment and make a nice profit.
    The 100 years copyright term however is ludicrous.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •