Reply With Quote
This could only be done if both the owners can be convinced that they'll actually make more money per game and the players are willing to accept a pay cut.
Assuming they can strike a compromise, I like somewhere in the 60-65 range.
It was all that, jacob. You'd sit there and see your game Tuesday night, Wednesday night and Thursday night. It wasn't money from home, or, a good nut, but, it was immediately after those two.
This could only be done if both the owners can be convinced that they'll actually make more money per game and the players are willing to accept a pay cut.
Assuming they can strike a compromise, I like somewhere in the 60-65 range.
82 games is fine.
it should be 76 games
The issue is not the number of game, 82 games can be. The problem is 82 games in half a year it's just stupid and crazy.
82 games in 9 or 10 months should be just fine.
Oh and eradicate the back to back games waste of time and talent.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions