I try to keep it fresh.
2001 was only 9 years ago and some people still think it's old? These are the same people who have no problem bringing up Darwin that was what 1800's?
And these same people hate when others bring up Derek Fisher's 0.4 Shot claiming that was ancient history only 4 years ago?
you people need to re-install your time zone clocks before you make outlandish statements.
yeah why ppl get so upset about this. It's good to ask questions.
people are still asking if we really landed on the moon what's wrong with a 9/11 question?
I sometimes think I am adopted. Am I a conspiracy theorist?
conspiracy theorist is are nut bags when they bring up JFK or 9/11
conspiracy theorist are GOD's when they talk about Darwin or Evolution.
do the math.
can't help myself when threads like this pop up. too much fun.
uh huh......
Im thinking you can't help it either
since you are the main resident multiple-personality poster, should I refer to you as "you people" as well?
what's your question?
it's always been ....
or at least until Bush ed it all up.
Why was wtc7 not in the 9/11 report?
How come not one jet fighter was scrambled during the worst attack in US history and yet a year earlier over 129 jet fighters were?
I think all of you know the standard response by now.it's always been ....
or at least until Bush ed it all up.
Not sure why you ignore the truth.
So you go into a 9/11 topic ask posters "what is your question?" and when they ask one you tell them they should know all this already?
Is that the worst cop out in ST history or your way of saying I have no ing idea I wish I had never asked the question?
Just for s and giggles why not answer the questions for those reading who may not be so knowledgeable on the lies of 9/11?
Try to do so by Thursday morning as I have a few more I would like you to answer.
if another poster other than you asks a question, I'll be glad to answer it.
YOU [mouse] and your cronie troll split personality freak troll names already have received the answer to these questions ad nauseum.
no. it's saying you are an idiot that is regurgitating the same crap over again.Is that the worst cop out in ST history or your way of saying I have no ing idea I wish I had never asked the question?
this time it just happens to be in the club instead of the poli forum.
CD already beat me to answer miami heat's question.Just for s and giggles why not answer the questions for those reading who may not be so knowledgeable on the lies of 9/11?
I will give you that you are definitely an expert regarding lying about 9/11.
Naw, you would just answer my answer with another stupid question that you already know the answer to.Try to do so by Thursday morning as I have a few more I would like you to answer.
Don't get me wrong though. This is still fun.
Well Blake why even join in on the conversation if your going to make excuses about who you will only answer too? And props for not telling me to go my Mother like you did in the past your making progress!
Jets were scrambled.
Because these kids with a 3 chip camera and final cut pro don't have reliable sources. And besides conspiracy theorists tend to have psychological issues....
So anyone who has a question about 9/11 is a conspiracy theorists?
Nice little narrow mind you have going there. I can't wait till you visit San Antonio and ask a question about the Alamo.
Really? In all the time I stared at the TV that day I didn't see not one fighter jet what show was you watching?
NORAD Stand-DownFailures to Scramble
No plausible explanation has been provided for failing to scramble interceptors in a timely fashion from bases within easy range to protect the September 11th targets. Fighters that were dispatched were scrambled from distant bases. Early in the attack, when Flight 11 had turned directly south toward New York City, it was obvious that New York City and the World Trade Center, and Washington D.C. would be likely targets. Yet fighters were not scrambled from the bases near the targets. They were only scrambled from distant bases. Moreover there were no redundant or backup scrambles.
New York City
Flight 11 had been flying south toward New York City from about 8:30 AM. Yet no interceptors were scrambled from nearby Atlantic City, or La Guardia, or from Langley, Virginia. Numerous other bases were not ordered to scramble fighters.
Washington D.C.
No interceptors were scrambled from Andrews Air Force Base to protect the capital, at least not before the Pentagon was hit. Andrews Air Force Base had two squadrons of fighters on alert, and is only about 10 miles from the Pentagon.
The Prevention of Interceptions of the Commandeered Planes
It is standard operating procedure (SOP) to scramble jet fighters whenever a jetliner goes off course or radio contact with it is lost. Between September 2000 and June 2001, interceptors were scrambled 67 times. 1 In the year 2000 jets were scrambled 129 times. 2
There are several elements involved in domestic air defense. The air traffic control system continuously monitors air traffic and notifies NORAD of any deviations of any aircraft from their flight-paths or loss of radio contact. NORAD monitors air and space traffic continuously and is prepared to react immediately to threats and emergencies. It has the authority to order units from the Air National Guard, the Air Force, or other armed services to scramble fighters in pursuit of jetliners in trouble.
Routine interception procedures were not followed on September 11th, 2001.
Why did you lie about jets' not being scrambled?
Because I like millions of others did not see any. Your point is like saying your dying at a ST gtg and no one cares to help you. And I say that is not true we all wanted to help you.
Your going to go by what really took place and that is you saw no one came up to you.
the rest is all talk.
facts are no jets were ever seen in any area of any of the that was taking place. Not one by the Pentagon the most so called protect spot on earth? Not one by Washington where one plane supposedly crashed to the ground, and not one by the WTC which already had been hit by a plane? You have a case where a man falls asleep in his plane and 10 minutes later there is a Fighter plane to see why, and yet the WTC gets hit by a large passenger plane that was hijacked and no sign of a fighter pilot? If you can't question that your one easy to convince American.
You can say all these so called jets were scrambled but that's is all hearsay if not one actually showed up where the was. And besides your going to harp on one portion of the topic to avoid the meat of all the lies? You rather find some small portion of the topic to dwell on instead of saying why WTC7 is not in the 9/11 report? Your bias and one sided on all the 9/11 issues and you really have nothing to ad since your happy with everything you have been told.
Which amazes me since you seem to be able to question Bush in the past but not 9/11
I find that odd where you draw the lines.
So this is the thread that got B2B panties all up in a wad?
I haven't read it and probably won't, cliffs?
Question of the day.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
