Rasho or Nazr. Who would you start in the playoffs?

[bigbendbruisebrother]

Defense does win Champinoships. Assuming of course that you can score some points on the other end. What is it now, 5.9 PPG?

So let's bench Bowen too. And by all means, we should judge all players from now on solely on by their PPG average.

[T Park]

Rasho.

Because his defense on the team is behind Bowen Ginobili and Duncan for best, and because hes very familiar with the system.

Plus you dont change lineups wih 3 games left in the season if the said player is healthy.


Next year?? yeah Nazr takes over if he has learned the system and has gotten better defensively.

[IceColdBrewski]

So let's bench Bowen too. And by all means, we should judge all players now solely on by their PPG average. There are no such thing as role players, huh?

Hey, and I think I've found my new signature. As you said in your redundant thread:
"Fundamentals? I could give a damn about fundamentals."
http://spurstalk.com/forums/showthre...t=13610&page=2

Your arguments were refuted in that thread, so now you're trying the same bull in another. We hear you dude. You don't like Rasho. Your voice has been heard, and you have been validated as a devoted Spurs fan.

Hey and look at your poll results.

Good gawd. Some of you get way too serious with these discussions.

You act as though I'm supposed to be heartbroken about a poll on a message board. Sorry to diappoint you. The fundamentals statement just came out wrong. I meant that I could care less about how funamentally sound Rasho is. I'd still be honored to be a part of your sig though.

[T Park]

meant that I could care less about how funamentally sound Rasho is

If you dont care about fundamentals for one player, obviously it doesnt matter for other players.

That simple.

[Manu20]

Rasho because he knows the spurs system.
But next season could be a different story.

[14dave]

Rasho!!!!

[IceColdBrewski]

If you dont care about fundamentals for one player, obviously it doesnt matter for other players.

That simple.

Now you're just makin up. But that's about all your good for most of the time. You certainly don't add anything of interest around here.

Let me spell it out for you. I COULD CARE LESS ABOUT RASHO'S FUNDAMENTALS WHEN IT COMES TO DECIDING BETWEEN HIM AND NAZR.

[bigbendbruisebrother]

Now you're just makin up.

From the book of Brewski, chapter http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...t=13610&page=2

"Fundamentals? I could give a damn about fundamentals. What I want is a big man who will get in there, fight for the rebound and jam that er back in." Ice Cold Brewski

I note in the above cited thread (cough, redundant) that you've avoided responding to Solid D's points about Rasho's D versus Nazr's. You should read them.

[milkyway21]

Rasho but more minutes for Nazr, as back up. 10-12 minutes is not enough, Pops.

[IceColdBrewski]

From the book of Brewski, chapter http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...t=13610&page=2

"Fundamentals? I could give a damn about fundamentals. What I want is a big man who will get in there, fight for the rebound and jam that er back in." Ice Cold Brewski

I note in the above cited thread (cough, redundant) that you've avoided responding to Solid D's points about Rasho's D versus Nazr's. You should read them.

Solid D had a very lovely OPINION of Rasho and his All World defensive play. I had stats to back up my arguement however. While I'll agree that stats don't always tell the whole story, they do however tell most of the story.

I can also tell you what I've seen with my own eyes. Rasho does alot of standing around in situtions where he could be fighting for a rebound, going for a block, or boxing out.

Say what you will about your hall of famer Rasho. But my mind is made up. The boy has no heart.

[ducks]

good question