Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 27 of 27
  1. #26
    Steele Curtain cherylsteele's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    3,315
    Well, Tim, TP, and Manu are all locked down for the next 6-7 years. Thats a nice core to build a team around. Not to mention the "2000" foreign players SA owns the rights to. I think the Spurs can be a dynasty if they play their cards right.
    Malik too ha d a long-term deal and was still traded......like you said "if they play cards right"......even if they do, there is never a guarantee of sucsess.

  2. #27
    Spurs Homer. D'oh! MadDog73's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    3,610
    A Dynasty?? LMAO!

    The spurs can't even win back-to-back les!!!

    Worst champion ever!

    LOL @ Lakerfraud!

    The only true Dynasties are the teams that actually win in multiple Finals, AKA The Celtics and the Bulls.

    I know I'm in the minority on this, but I can't count the Lakers as a Dynasty because they LOSE most of their Final games. Until they get a winning % in the Finals, Lakers will remain Losers in my book, along with all their bandwagon fans.

    As for the Spurs being a Dynasty, we just need to win 2 or 3 more les this year to be considered another "dynasty". And I like the Spurs chances to do that a whole bunch better than the Lakers.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •