Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 30 of 30
  1. #26
    Displaced 101A's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    7,711
    "nationalizing health care"

    You Lie, as usual

    the issue is about a public, national health insurance, not nationalizing health providers


    You can't nationalize health insurance without doing away with this law.

  2. #27
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,810
    It was support linked to this direct reply to 101A @ #11:

    All of you Libs please name the company which has a monopoly on Health Insurance in this country.

    I'll wait.
    Mightn't there be states where this is plausibly the case for health care insurance?
    The McCarran-Ferguson Act allows government control when the states doesn't.
    I'll buy that. Your point?

    Why is the removal of this law needed, other than to open the door to nationalizing health care?
    I'm not sure that it is. That's what we're discussing.
    Last edited by Winehole23; 10-21-2009 at 02:54 PM.

  3. #28
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    "In a vote that was a highly symbolic proxy for the larger partisan fight over health care policy, the Senate on Wednesday rejected a bill that would have averted steep cuts in Medicare payments to doctors."

    --NYT

    the number was something like $250B.

    the docs have carte blance to keep ing us over, after we've ed ourselves over making ourselves diseased fat- s.

  4. #29
    Displaced 101A's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    7,711
    "In a vote that was a highly symbolic proxy for the larger partisan fight over health care policy, the Senate on Wednesday rejected a bill that would have averted steep cuts in Medicare payments to doctors."

    --NYT

    the number was something like $250B.

    the docs have carte blance to keep ing us over, after we've ed ourselves over making ourselves diseased fat- s.
    That 3 f-bomb statement is sig worthy for someone who doesn't already possess a Bouton's sig.

  5. #30
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    That 3 f-bomb statement is sig worthy for someone who doesn't already possess a Bouton's sig.
    I guess he's angry because 12 democrats and one independent voted with the republicans:

    Roll Call 325, 1 Oct 09, S. 1776
    A bill to amend le XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for the update under the Medicare physician fee schedule for years beginning with 2010 and to sunset the application of the sustainable growth rate formula, and for other purposes.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •