Why does the GOP want employers to have the right to sexually harass (or worse) their employees? Does anybody really believe employer-established arbitration is neutral?
Obama defeated Hillary, even among women. I don't know the data regarding KBH and Perry. But there are lots of reasons for women (and men)to prefer ANYONE over Perry.
I agree with you that gender matters. But having said that, it is a long way to go to say that it is determinative. Perry was touting all of his female support in his last run, and attributed much of the said support to his good looks.
My implication in the last post was that to get such uniform support from every female senator my reflect an issue of far more importance to women than many male republicans can understand. And that can hurt them. Women don't have to believe that they 'support rape' in order to believe that they don't care about it enough to overcome their big-business bias.
Why does the GOP want employers to have the right to sexually harass (or worse) their employees? Does anybody really believe employer-established arbitration is neutral?
Thank god they passed the anti-imaginary sex slave legislation.
That is so much more dangerous than real rape.
I see this has developed into another thread where lib s use no reasoning.
Bye.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)