Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 44 of 44
  1. #26
    Veteran spursfan1000's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Post Count
    3,698
    I am not advocating Blair to start but I see alot of people talking about spacing... Duncan is taking more and more shots outside.... Why can't Duncn be the one that is used at spacing the floor for Blair for short stints if they are going to play together? It's not like Ducan is under the hoop every play... He is usually shooting from the top of the key after rolling from a pick and roll... or banking it of the glass from 10-15 ft out...
    Now that I think of that it's true but I don't think that Mcdyess will bring as much as energy off the bench as Blair would.

  2. #27
    Veteran Chomag's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Post Count
    8,772
    I like Mcdyess starting more because he has better defense for the other starting big men around the league, Blair would not spread the floor with Duncan...it would be better to start Mcdyess and Duncan so Mcdyess could spread the floor and bring Bonner and Blair off the bench so Bonner can spread the floor, so keep it at what it is.
    I realy don't like the Blair, Bonner on the floor together for our bench frontline.it just doesnt seem like enough size and strength up front. I think someone like Theo is needed with Blair. that is if we want any kind of defence out there.

  3. #28
    I needs six for my fix. UnWantedTheory's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    2,101
    Blair would bring alot of energy to the starters which they need.. if not him then start manu. The spurs need energy to start games.
    We need cohesion more. Dice can spread the floor, since he is a shooter, despite whoever claimed otherwise. Manu and Blair in the second unit makes more sense "energy" wise than either of them starting. The problems with the starting five, as I stated above, are cohesion and adjustments.

  4. #29
    I needs six for my fix. UnWantedTheory's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    2,101
    Well IMO.

  5. #30
    I needs six for my fix. UnWantedTheory's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    2,101
    I realy don't like the Blair, Bonner on the floor together for our bench frontline.it just doesnt seem like enough size and strength up front. I think someone like Theo is needed with Blair. that is if we want any kind of defence out there.
    Bonner can still spread the floor and the hope I would assume, is that Blair plays bigger. Although, I dont necessarily like it either in some cases. Again, just my opinion.

  6. #31
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Post Count
    2,683
    blair should play ~30 minutes but still come off the bench. he usually plays with the second unit and meshes well with them, especially manu

  7. #32
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    42,293
    Our spacing would be horrible..

    Bogans is too inconsistent from outside, Parker is too inconsistent from outside, RJ isn't shooting well, and Blair doesn't have range..

  8. #33
    Start Dice The Red Hood's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    805
    I guess it depends on who's playing better but you don't award Blair by starting him you award Blair by giving him more minutes than Bonner.

  9. #34
    NBAChamp..to be Continued SpurNation's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Post Count
    1,473
    And in the next game he could foul out in 10 minutes. Blair is like the whole Spurs team right now...moments of greatness with consistent minutes of inconsistency.

  10. #35
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    8,696
    people obsess over 'spreading the floor' way too much. That kind of nonsense led people to believe that Scola sucked and Bonner was sooooooo much better.

    in 03 they won with Robinson and Rose next to Duncan, and at that point neither of those guys were superstars from mid-range, especially Robinson. In 05 Nazr was the starter, he rarely took shots from outside 10 feet. In 07 there was Oberto and Elson, and those guys had minimal impact spreading the floor, between them it seemed they'd get about 1 open shot in the midrange a game.

    Yes, he had problems next to Duncan like going to set a screen at the same time and place as Duncan. But that won't happen regularly as he plays more. It's like expecting him to score a tip in for the other team every game.

  11. #36
    I'm Mavs>Spurs bitch Allanon's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Post Count
    12,224
    Replacing Dice with Blair will make the Tony/Jefferson problem even more glaring.

  12. #37
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    42,293
    The problem isn't just spreading the floor in the frontcourt..

    The problem is that Bogans can't shoot on a consistent basis, Parker can't, RJ is struggling and isn't a great shooter anyways..

    When you have NO reliable shooters from anywhere on the floor, teams will make you pay..

  13. #38
    GO TIAGO GO! JustinJDW's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Post Count
    734
    Blair works better coming off the Bench with energy. He fits the role perfectly.

  14. #39
    I’M A DAMN SPUR!
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    769
    timmy and dice as starters w/ a steady diet of minutes works. i feel like pop has a certain amount of minutes to go around for two backup bigs once dice has the playbook pat and can fill the big # 2 role (w/ his bbiq and strength he can hopefully give us some heads up oberto plays-buckets when the j isn't falling.)

    The nice thing about having three backups is that it gives coach an opportunity to see who can earn their minutes in a given game/series. If/when pop feels good about giving ratliff 10-20 mpg consistently we could offset a night where bonner lays an egg or blair gets lost in the set by cooling him on the bench and letting big theo anchor the paint for a bit.

  15. #40
    One of the most best jag's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    13,882
    Rapper/Kill Bill Pana

  16. #41
    TD since 97 ezau's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    7,232
    Man ,McDyess is not a shooter too
    Dice has a very dependable jump shot. He plays a lot like Kurt Thomas although he's quicker and he's a better defender

  17. #42
    selbstverständlich Agloco's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    9,019
    Leave the starting five alone.
    Agreed, Blair is at his mos effective when he's out there with Manu. Maximize the time those two have together. Come to think of it, Mason does a decent job of getting him the ball too.

  18. #43
    Chopper Ed Helicopter Jones's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    14,068
    I like what the bench brings in this current rotation. But our starters were definitely out of synch last night. I'm interested to see how this team gels in the next 4 months. As Blair learns to play in this league I certainly wouldn't object to an increase in his minutes.

  19. #44
    All Your Best Lions #2!'s Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    953
    As noted previously, everyone plays better when they play alongside Manu. And since Manu's minutes are probably going to be increased to a 25/game limit, and that number will probably hold for a while.

    There simply isn't enough Manu to go around. But actually I wouldn't mind having Ginobili start, and allowing Hill, Blair, and, sometimes, RMJr to play the bench sparkplug role. The talent level top to bottom demands at least considering moving back to a more traditional roation. The only question would be concerning Keith Bogans's role on the team, b/c it might be more difficult for him to be effective if he doesn't have star players on the offensive end.

    Although, with four players at least capable of being the main option on an offensive unit, that it seems like it wouldn't be difficult to make sure one of them is on the court at all times.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •