What other contending West team would have Finley and Bonner?

[The Truth #6]

It's true. Bonner is quite helpful to get through the regular season, which with our veteran team, is an important part of the process.

I remember in an early pre-season game and Bonner was lighting it up and the board went crazy thinking he'd turned the corner. Improvements, yes. But that was typical of Bonner to shoot lights out in a meaningless game. The less important the game, the better he shoots. He's making small strides but he's fairly set at this point as far as what sort of player he is.

He's probably not suited to this team anyway because of our focus on defense, but he's busting his ass so I can always compliment his effort.

[poop]

Scolas buyout had finally gone down in summer of 2007, right after Poop was named Director of All Things Basketball for the Spurs (or whatever his le became. I prefer Lord Poppy ). At any rate he had huge say in personell and he chose to extend Finley and Bonner and shun affordable Scola. You see the results. Case closed.

its true

im the one in the background pulling the strings

[duhoh]

Scola deal had to come down to money. Because the spurs had oberto, they passed on scola. Anybody who thought scola couldn't play in the nba is a re and shouldn't be making basketball decisions.

scola's first 10 games were complete garbage though, let's not forget that. i agree with everything else though