Why are you trying to change the subject again, mogrovejo?
I was talking about plans to restore fiscal and budgetary well-being. Did you not notice?
Why are you trying to change the subject again, mogrovejo?
No, I did not. Can you please put in bold where you did that?
The two statements are not incongruous. Any time the GOP actually deigns to disclose its actual ideas instead of just more fake bull , would be just fine with me.
The opposition can make itself an actually existing alternative to the powers that be, if it so desires. The GOP, apparently, does not so desire.
Judging by the reaction of the public, the GOP just has to say no and they get more and more votes. I believe they should do something. That is why I am glad to see tea party people taking over precints and nominating the people that want to be fiscally conservative. However with how stupidly the Dems are using their super majorities, the Repubs could not even show up for work and still get their majorities back. Plus get the WH in 3 years. I hope they make another contract style domestic issues promises but doubt they will need to.
I didn't say the statements were incongruous. I've already covered the incongruence between your theory of declaring guilty of fake outrage and deserving of acerb criticism anyone who complains about the use of politics as usual tactics by their opponents, no matter the validity of the claims, and your reiterated practice of quickly doing it yourself to criticize the GOP and conservatives.
What I want to know is where in those statements you were "talking about plans to restore fiscal and budgetary well-being"? Can you bold the exact sentences or not?
Last edited by mogrovejo; 12-14-2009 at 07:27 PM.
Your powers of reading seem to have failed you again. You get my sympathy, sir, but no help.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)