Reply With Quote
I like you man,...but your crazy...
No, since this is called a hypothetical. Which is why I included a qualifier in my statement. What is ridiculous is you thinking Pop drew up a play for Bonner at the end of the game. That is real world, and you really thought that.
I like you man,...but your crazy...
Dumbass stating an obvious plan that can't work...
Top free agents like wade don't want to go to San Antonio.
+1I like you man,...but your crazy...
dumbass cant contribute anything to the thread so he completely ignore the word "suggestion" and responds with something cynacle that makes him look like a dumb
while wade would be nice, this is duncan's, then parker's team. it would be really wierd to see him accept a role like that, especially when he's a guy that you can build a franchise around.
free agents will go anywhere if the money is right and the team is right!!!
the spurs has the "second
Wade will be loved in Texas.
that .... if you land Wade.... depending on the RC moves if he does any.... the Spurs should Be Wade's team
Ok. That is just ridiculous. Sure Wade is a franchise player, but the Spurs will still be Timmy's team probably 2 years AFTER he retires.
San Antonio is to small of a market for DWade. The NBA is a business first, and for DWade to come here wouldn't be to smart in his part. If Miami doesn't get another elite player to join him, i see him going to chicago. Rose and Wade would be the best back court in the NBA. Plus they're hometown kids, it be perfect.
to be honest with you i dont see the southern texas market small to the NBA anymore everything georgetown and below I35 represents San Antonio and Austin area....
It's not yet a continuous media market, however. Spurs games are blacked out in Austin, meaning the advertising revenue is smaller, meaning we're still a small market team.
I admitted I was wrong after I read the post-game quotes, and you're a for bringing it up like I wronged you with it or something. Tim passing out to him and setting a screen looked like a set play, considering Bonner was our best player that night; he also has never called for a screen and roll clear out (4 feet outside the 3pt line), or handled the ball in such a situation, in his entire life as a Spur.
Last edited by z0sa; 12-11-2009 at 03:31 PM.
exactly !! manu and jeff for Wade ? if it was possible its in fact a no brainer
What he really meant to say....
Spurs couldn't even convince a scrub like Corey Maggette to come here. He chose a ing lottery team over playing for a perennial playoff team like SA. Even if we had all the cap space in the world, we'd have NO shot at someone like Wade or Bosh.free agents will go anywhere if the money is right and the team is right!!!
the spurs has the "second
Wade will be loved in Texas.
Shutup .
It's not a trade. It's called once again tanking the season by getting rid of our biggest acquisitions and probably not even passing the first round even with Manu. Then hoping Wade and Parker doesn't completely destroy Tim's spacing, which by then he'll need even more, since neither can hit a 3 to save his life. I won't mention the fact both dominate the ball and have similar styles of play. But hey, DPG's watching out for Holt's pocketbook when Timmy retires - Wade will surely bring the fans in.
You sound like a for bringing up the Wade thing like I wronged you....Quit acting butt hurt.
What don't you understand about the word hypothetical? Why is this such a hard concept? The fact that you are even trying to come up with arguments, even hypothetically, as to why getting Wade essentially for the mentioned pieces and the mentioned method (which once again, is only hypothetical) makes you look like a fool. Under no cir stances would it be a bad idea or fit. It would be a no brainer.
But hey, Zosa knows a lot about basketball - He tells us about drawing up plays for Bonner and why getting Wade on the Spurs for Manu/RJ/Dice would be a bad idea.
You did "wrong" me, if that's what you consider wronging. I can detect sarcasm. It's also not the first snide remark you've made towards me.
Specify where I failed to understand the concept, with a quote. I made 2 "serious" posts to see if the OP actually had some real ideas in mind. Magically cutting and trading players isn't a hypothetical in any real sense, it's a fantasy. The fantasy continued by saying Wade would surely join SA. The fantasy continued even further when it "definitely put us over the top." If you want to talk to me behind the curtains of your ing fantasy, go ahead and be stupid.What don't you understand about the word hypothetical? Why is this such a hard concept?
Thanks for your opinion. It is a message board, where opinions are welcome, even if it makes you seem like a total .The fact that you are even trying to come up with arguments, even hypothetically, as to why getting Wade essentially for the mentioned pieces and the mentioned method (which once again, is only hypothetical) makes you look like a fool.
I disagree. I'm not willing to let another year of the Tim Duncan era be wasted, even for a "hypothetical" where we get Wade while losing Manu, RJ, and Dyess. I'd rather contend both of these next 2 years than just one.Under no cir stances would it be a bad idea or fit. It would be a no brainer.
Is there a reason you're insulting me? I've never done to you. you are the one acting butthurt.But hey, Zosa knows a lot about basketball - He tells about drawing up plays for Bonner and why getting Wade on the Spurs for Manu/RJ/Dice would be a bad idea.
Last edited by z0sa; 12-11-2009 at 05:07 PM.
Is there a reason you are insulting me? Besides just wanting to look like a ?
How am I insulting you? By saying you said the play was drawn up for Matt Bonner? That is not an insult, that is a fact.
You keep crying and whinning, but you are the one that singled me out directly. Then you did it again, then you send me pm's. You are taking this wayyyyyy to personally.
It is a hypothetical. You are trying too hard to apply real world applications. This is not something that is likely. But either you understand that and partake knowing so, or you don't. But don't try and come in here and say that given the cir stances (of the proposed hypothetical working out) that getting Wade would be bad.
You keep saying "and what, have another mediocre year"...Well, if we are trying to apply a lot of real world applications to this hypothetical, then the Spurs chances of winning are not good this year. That means they are going to be mediocre by their standards anyways. So why not get Wade for next year (which in this hypothetical was the guarantee).
You're repeating my statements, even though they're used in different contexts.
You were being facetious. Deny it you want.How am I insulting you? By saying you said the play was drawn up for Matt Bonner? That is not an insult, that is a fact.
They're visitor messages, not PMs. Anyone can see them. I didn't know there was a rule against using them.You keep crying and whinning, but you are the one that singled me out directly. Then you did it again, then you send me pm's. You are taking this wayyyyyy to personally.
It's not a hypothetical. It's a troll attempt and a fantasy. Hypotheticals are defined as "highly conjectural", as in it could happen. The situation being proposed would never happen.It is a hypothetical. You are trying too hard to apply real world applications.
It's impossible. No one will take on RJ's contract, it's why we gave up trash for him.This is not something that is likely.
Wow, alright moderator DPG. , I coulda sworn you were a newbie compared to the time I've spent here. I'll let you know when I wanna post in a thread again. Not.But either you understand that and partake knowing so, or you don't. But don't try and come in here and say that given the cir stances (of the proposed hypothetical working out) that getting Wade would be bad.
I didn't, I don't. I just wanted to make the OP understand why this could never happen, through a series of leading questions, if he was truly being honest. If he was not, he would fall flat on his face, or insult me and I could call him a troll. Who'd have known you'd start insulting me when I felt a little confused at the ridiculousness of calling out other fans over this nonsense. Apparently you think I shouldn't be harmed by it, I'm not.You keep saying "and what, have another mediocre year"...Well, if we are trying to apply a lot of real world applications to this impossible fantasy,
I would prefer to contend this year and next, rather than just next. My opinion, my choice, which you apparently cannot handle. Call it stupid, go ahead. I invest too much time and emotion into the Spurs to write them off another year for little more chances at a le.then the Spurs chances of winning are not good this year. That means they are going to be mediocre by their standards anyways. So why not get Wade for next year (which in this hypothetical was the guarantee).
I'm done, I now honestly and fullheartedly apologize for calling you names or being a . I am overly argumentative apparently, and it gets the best of me. I'm sorry.
Lakers fans are on the top of the world right now and deserve to be with a great start, and a great top 6 and a championship in the bank last year but is along season and the Lakers are not without flaws (i.e. almost no bench).
Bring it on = with the considerable talent on the Spurs AS COMPOSED = it might well still be Spurs fans giving Lakers fans advice next summer while the Lakers fish and the Spurs chase another le.
Last edited by Rummpd; 12-11-2009 at 05:43 PM.
You know what is funny? I was honestly just about to post this to you. I am sarcastic at times, and I definitely love to debate (Chump and I head the SpursTalk Debate team), but I honestly was not trying to be a . I was poking fun at you, but not in a harmful way and I am sorry if it comes across like that.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions