Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 37 of 37
  1. #26
    Clever got me this far... JMarkJohns's Avatar
    My Team
    Phoenix Suns
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Post Count
    10,116
    angels are done. at least the dodgers have no compe ion in the nl west. their crap off-season still means a division le
    What the are you talking about? Rockies will win the division, and the Giants are right there will the Rockies. Dodgers are looking at third, and, don't count out the Diamondbacks to get back into the Division race. Should Webb even be 80% of what he used to be (the most efficient pitcher in baseball, 1-time Cy Young, 2-time runner-up), and with the addition of Edwin Jackson, the Diamondbacks have a top-3 that could go deep into games and make them .500 compe ive. Upton and Reynolds are the core of the offense, but Jackson was .300-25-90 type the season prior, and is returning to their lineup. Their offense was finally starting to come around despite Jackson's absence, so they could be very compe ive with the Dodgers.

    Not joking, dude, but the Dodgers are more than likely to finish third and very well could finish fourth.

  2. #27
    Clever got me this far... JMarkJohns's Avatar
    My Team
    Phoenix Suns
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Post Count
    10,116
    there's something wrong when a guy who won the Cy Young award a little over a year ago has been traded twice in the last 6 months.
    Agents... I've heard he wants CC money (23-25 mill per)...

  3. #28
    Banned
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Post Count
    3,977
    What the are you talking about? Rockies will win the division, and the Giants are right there will the Rockies. Dodgers are looking at third, and, don't count out the Diamondbacks to get back into the Division race. Should Webb even be 80% of what he used to be (the most efficient pitcher in baseball, 1-time Cy Young, 2-time runner-up), and with the addition of Edwin Jackson, the Diamondbacks have a top-3 that could go deep into games and make them .500 compe ive. Upton and Reynolds are the core of the offense, but Jackson was .300-25-90 type the season prior, and is returning to their lineup. Their offense was finally starting to come around despite Jackson's absence, so they could be very compe ive with the Dodgers.

    Not joking, dude, but the Dodgers are more than likely to finish third and very well could finish fourth.
    after reading what you posted i stand by my statement

  4. #29
    Clever got me this far... JMarkJohns's Avatar
    My Team
    Phoenix Suns
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Post Count
    10,116
    Ridiculously foolish... Colorado was a better team than the Dodgers by season's end and the Giants are young offensively but have shown some good potential. Dodgers haven't done jack... even the Diamondbacks basically add an two All-Star starters in Webb/Jackson and a .300-20-90 type of bat.

  5. #30
    Banned
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Post Count
    3,977
    you are biased for a team and i am biased for a team. this will go nowhere, i will agree to disagree

  6. #31
    Clever got me this far... JMarkJohns's Avatar
    My Team
    Phoenix Suns
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Post Count
    10,116
    I'm not biased for the Diamondbacks... I'm saying the Rockies are better than, that the Giants likely will be and the Diamondbacks could be as good as the Dodgers.

    Throw out the first two months of last season and I believe the Dodgers finish third in the Division. That hot start won't happen again...

    I would anticipate the order being Rockies (92 wins), Giants (88 wins), Dodgers (85 wins) and Diamondbacks (82 wins)...

    But it wouldn't surprise me if the Dodgers fell behind the Diamondbacks considering the talent Arizona is essentially adding.

  7. #32
    Bruce Bowen 2.0 Horry For 3!'s Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    18,446
    I think this trade is stupid for the Phillies, they are givin up Lee and good prospects and gettin back Halladay and okay prospects.


    Mariners come out on top in this deal though with gettin Lee and only havin to give up 2 prospects.

  8. #33
    Great Length
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Post Count
    2,588
    Glad the Phillies had to give up Drabek. I wonder how much better this really makes them for next year, nobody could pitch better then Cliff Lee pitched in the 09 playoffs. I'm surprised they couldn't find a way to get Halladay and keep Lee even for just this year when looking at the prospects they gave up.

  9. #34
    Govt, stay away!
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    10,403
    I don't understand philly's thinking what so ever behind this trade.

  10. #35
    Dragon style JamStone's Avatar
    My Team
    Detroit Pistons
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    22,198
    Along the same lines as what's been said already, perhaps the Phillies don't believe that Cliff Lee can pitch the same way next year like he had in the playoffs. He did have a little bit of inconsistency year to year in Cleveland. And, knowing they'll have a hard time affording Lee, perhaps the Phillies think if he has a down year, they wouldn't be able to get the same caliber of prospects if they wait to trade him next year. I'm just guessing.

  11. #36
    The cat won symple19's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Post Count
    16,246
    I like this deal for the Mariners too. Cliff/Felix 1-2 punch is nasty.

    Halladay will probably be untouchable pitching in the NL though, so the Phils are still the NL frontrunner, IMO.

  12. #37
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    2,869
    This deal is pretty simple for the Phillies. They had three choices:

    Do nothing: Cliff Lee is your ace this year then walks at the end of the year because they already tried to re-sign him and he wants a CC deal. Something the Phillies arent looking to give him.

    Trade for Halladay and keep Lee: Great for this year....but risky. If one of them gets hurt you're screwed because your farm is empty now.

    Option 3 is what they chose: Trading for Halladay gives you a top 3 pitcher in baseball for the next FOUR years, and you still get 2 of Seattles top 10 prospects. They might not be the same caliber but you never know how prospects will turn out...you know exactly what you're getting in Halladay. Drabek is obviously a great great talent, but is coming off TJ surgery at a young age (probably wont be a big deal, but there are questions) and Taylor is a stud in the minors but blocked right now by 3 all start OF's in Philly.

    I like what the Phils did.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •