experiment over start ginobili

[boutons]

"plus didnt barry hit a three?"

He hit 1-3 3G's, and 3Gs were the only shots he took. Rasho played 9 minutes less that Brent, but also shot 1-3.

Brent ain't shooting, he ain't driving.
Bruce shot 1-3.
Bruce/Brent/Nazer did little on offense (3 starters score total of 12 points),
Tim sucked,
Tony sucked,
Nazr sucked,
Spurs win.

What an ugly, weird game.

=====================

edit: I forgot about Nazr totally. I wonder why?

[MaNuMaNiAc]

"plus didnt barry hit a three?"

He hit 1-3 3G's, and 3Gs were the only shots he took. Rasho played 9 minutes less that Brent, but also shot 1-3.

Brent ain't shooting, he ain't driving.
Bruce shot 1-3.
Bruce/Brent did little on offense (2 starters score total of 7 points),
Tim sucked,
Tony sucked,
Spurs win.

What an ugly, weird game.

He hit 1-3 3G's, and 3Gs were the only shots he took. Rasho played 9 minutes less that Brent, but also shot 1-3.

Brent ain't shooting, he ain't driving.
Bruce shot 1-3.
Bruce/Brent did little on offense (2 starters score total of 7 points),
Tim sucked,
Tony sucked,
MANU RULED
Spurs win.

lol, I'm depressed though, because if we play like last night again I don't think we'll survive the series, seriously! Even with Manu playing like he played, we need Tim to feel his way through the game, if he isn't feeling it then our offense needs to run through someone else, and it shouldn't take all game for us to figure that out.

[boutons]

"if we play like last night again I don't think we'll survive the series, seriously!"

Well, if not this series, then some series, for sure. Spurs suck 2 out of 3 playoff games, and are lucky to be up 2-1, rather than 1-2. Not championship basketball.

Individual players, team overall, inconsistent as .

Pop MUST stop running the offense through Tim when Tim sucks.

And if Pop still does it, Tim has to realize when he sucks and pass the ball rather taking the most gawdawful clangers imaginable. He just throws the ball in the general direction of the backboard. How about shooting the ing the thing?

How many possessions can the Spurs afford to waste forcing the ball into a sucking Tim, hoping he starts hitting some shots?

There are plenty of other ways for Tim to change the game POSITIVELY other than killing the offense repeatedly.

Great thing about his foul trouble last night was that it took him out of the game and let others win the game without him.

[MaNuMaNiAc]

Great thing about his foul trouble last night was that it took him out of the game and let others win the game without him.

Agreed

[JUUOT]

Contrary to other and influenced by the italian soccer school, i am convinced:
winning a game when you were really bad against a good team is the sign of a championship caliber.

if you can win this one and on the road!!! you are att the right place. they need as much time and game as they can on their way to the le to get this automatism they could not have due to injuries.

Concerning the 4 down i do not understand how spurs can play such a superb team defense and such a horryble team offense going 4 down, that might be adapted before but it seems it goes against their own nature.

Boutons you were the one saying all year we would not have the le if we could not win tough one one the road and now that they do... can you just show us a littl;e smile even if everything is not perfect?

[boutons]

This win was ugly as , but it was on the road, so it is one of the few wins the Spurs have had on the road this year against good teams. It's a start. There are 10+ more playoff road games to get to the le. I hope the ugliness was just a "random off-night", and not due to the Spurs On The Road. A win Monday night, and how could it be uglier than last night's W?, would go along way to redressing the Spurs' road weakness.

[ducks]

spurs need some more tune up for sonics and houston
I think duncan is still not 100%