Westbrook is a better defender than Rose.
Rose can carry a team offensively, Westbrook can't.
I see a lot of potential in Collison, and he's been playing great in CP3's absence. He really needs to take care of the ball better though; 10 and 8 t/os in 2 of the past 4 games is pretty ridiculous.
Westbrook is a better defender than Rose.
Rose can carry a team offensively, Westbrook can't.
Ya Rose's points are much higher than Westbrook and Rose's fg% are higher too....
So, I guess the question is 20 ppg, 10 apg, 7 rpg on 48% shooting in the month of February as a second-year player really >>>>>> that much better than 21 ppg, 9 apg, 4 rpg on 49% shooting in the month of February as a rookie?
Westbrook has as much physical upside as any young PG in the League. Collison isn't likely to improve too much more on these numbers (other than becoming more efficient). But right now its hard to say that one is any appreciably better than the other.
kinda easy to average 20+ ppg on hornets, since there is not one else to take the shots.
on the Thunder, durant takes majority of the shots, so obviously the point guard isnt gonna score as much.
Yeah exactly. The Hornets' offense consists of the PG handling the ball 90% of the time, OKC spreads the ball around. NO's PG is naturally gonna put up big numbers.
westbrook > paul. at least westbrook plays.
and doesnt lose by 60
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)