I used to argue for Jefferson, I supported him and thought he should have more plays in his favor for a while..the Spurs DID start running more plays for him for a period of time, his usage % went up by a few points, it was a significant increase..he didn't respond though..
When the Spurs acquired Jefferson, it was a good trade considering what they gave up..I had confidence even their scouting, because I assumed they would do their homework on such a big acquisition..Jefferson was a horrible defender for the 2 years before this one in Milwaukee and NJ, partly due to lack of a defensive role and partly due to injuries that hurt his lateral quickness..the FO assumed(as they have said) that Jefferson could get back to his great D from earlier on, and it obviously hasn't happened..
Jefferson is actually shooting less jump shots this season than he did last season on average..he has more dunks this season, he's scoring inside more this season..he's never been able to create his own offense at a high level, he's always needed the motion offense and opportunities in transition..
It appears to me that the FO banked on RJ's shooting to continue improving like it did last season..he shot 46% off jump shots last season, the highest of his career..while it isn't significantly higher when you simply look at the %, it's much higher when you consider that he took a lot more jump shots last season than he ever had before..
Looking at it now, it appears that his hot shooting last season was an anomaly..he shot 40% from 3s last season despite taking more attempts than he ever had before..this is probably the biggest factor, at least IMO..it looks like the FO was banking on this..his jump shot % is down 3% despite shooting less jump shots, and his 3-point shooting % is down by 6%..
While it would help him a lot if the Spurs got more transition opportunities, the FO shouldn't have acquired a player that only scores in those types of situations and expected him to become the missing piece for the Spurs..a "missing piece" shouldn't be a player that needs to run to be effective..we can have that in Hairston or any other athletic wing..
From my standpoint, I didn't watch much of the Bucks last year, I only caught a few games..I had followed Jefferson for years when Vince was on the Nets and he was never a guy that you could give the ball to and create..I hadn't watched the Bucks play and I assumed that RJ's game had evolved a little by looking at his raw numbers, but this appears to be false..also combined with the shooting anomaly, like I said before..
The Spurs needed a 4th guy that could create for himself and his teammates, but they went out and acquired a guy that plays like a Shawn Marion-type..
While it would be nice if Jefferson could show more emotion, intensity and balls, it ultimately comes down to the FO making the wrong read on a player..Jefferson isn't THIS bad and he'll be better if he goes to a worse team that runs more, he's a guy that will continue to lose effectiveness as a player as his athleticism continues to decline..thankfully, he's finally starting to rebound and show some intensity lately, but he's not the type of guy that a team with le aspirations can rely upon..
The biggest difference between last year's Jefferson and this year's is simply shooting..it has very little to do with calling plays for him and getting more transition opportunities..he's getting more open looks and more assisted opportunities this season, but he simply isn't making any shots..the only thing we can really hope for at this point is for him to get hot and shoot like he did last season..
Based on previous years, it would be accurate to say that Jefferson's shooting last season, particularly from outside the arc, was probably an anomaly..we'll have to hope that he can somehow peak at the right time from a shooting standpoint..