What's is "it's the Warriors, he wouldn't do it in the Spurs" logic?

He scored 34 points while shooting 64% from the floor. You don't improve your ability to hit shots just because you play for the Warriors, otherwise they wouldn't be as bad as they are. Obviously in the Spurs he'd have less shots available due to pace and pecking order, but if he's shooting 64% then I want him to take every shot. And didn't Garrett Temple, who's half the scorer Tolliver is, score 15 points for the Spurs just a couple of days ago?

Anyway, I don't think anybody is saying that Tolliver can average 30ppg, be it in the Spurs or the Warriors. The guy is making the minimum salary, not the maximum. But as long as his outside shot doesn't desert him he's a better player than Bonner at a fraction of the cost. The "he wouldn't be a 30ppg scorer in the Spurs so who cares" argument is pretty weird.