Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 45 of 45
  1. #26
    Suck One Pop poop's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    3,157
    and Fabbs, the spurs were definitely not 'in' on any of these shady moves...in fact the opposite- they were THE main factor (and to a lesser degree the Pistons as well) for the league being in a position where they felt forced to 'take steps' in the first place. almost every dubious move perpetrated by 'the powers that be' since around 2006 were done with one goal in mind-to make things 'difficult' for the Spurs and the Pistons(and their style of basketball in general) to continue to win, while at the same time helping certain big money franchises/rivalries/glamour markets to rise to prominence once again.

    this is 100% indisputable fact.

  2. #27
    Veteran lotr1trekkie's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Post Count
    684
    IMO, the higher valued teams always get the calls in close series. It's subliminal. The refs can't help but know who are the Lakers vs anyone else is. Unfortunately for the Celtics finished second this year.
    The next diva team will be the Heat. I can't wait for the controversy as the MAGI ac ulate an average of 3 fouls a game. I expect a replay of 'Remember the ans', where coaches jump onto the court and demand the refs call the games as they see them. Not who was playing.

  3. #28
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    1,858
    _____________________________________________
    It's Game 7 of the Celtics-Lakers. KG does a nice quick step to get past Pao Gasol for a layup. Beaten, Gasol simply hacks KGs hand, clear for all to see. No whistle, no foul. Jeff Van Grunts say, and i kid you not, quote: "Good block by Gasol, hand is part of the ball."
    Van Gundy was right. The hand IS part of the ball. It's not a foul if you hit their hand when going for a block or steal. Wrist & arm is a foul, the hand holding the ball is NOT a foul.

  4. #29
    Believe. Fabbs's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Post Count
    15,577
    Van Gundy was right. The hand IS part of the ball. It's not a foul if you hit their hand when going for a block or steal. Wrist & arm is a foul, the hand holding the ball is NOT a foul.
    Are you nuts?
    Not when an opponent is shooting.

  5. #30
    Believe. Fabbs's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Post Count
    15,577
    Come on. If the Spurs had brought back a player that nobody else in the NBA made a serious effort to acquire, everyone would have caught the scent of their complicity in the league's conspiracy and the whole thing would have been exposed. This kind of stuff requires at least some degree of subtlety.
    Now after Matty Bonner and Jefferson are rewarded for their playoff play with both getting new 4 year contracts and at probably about 36 million bucks, the Lakers sign Matt Barnes for 1.8 mil per year for two years.

    What's that they say in legal terms, "Your witness".
    The floor is now yours.

  6. #31
    The Timeless One Leetonidas's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    29,609
    You know we won a le in 2007 right?

  7. #32
    Can't refuse Bito Corleone's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    1,029

  8. #33
    Five Rings... Kori Ellis's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Post Count
    64,671
    Are you nuts?
    Not when an opponent is shooting.
    It's not a foul if the hand is still in contact with the ball.

    The hand is considered "part of the ball" when it is in contact with the ball. Therefore, contact on that hand by a defender while it is in contact with the ball is not illegal.

  9. #34
    Believe. Fabbs's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Post Count
    15,577
    It's not a foul if the hand is still in contact with the ball.
    Completely disagree. Is this was true why not teach all defenders to simply hack at the shooters hand?
    We need word for word rulebook.

  10. #35
    Believe. Fabbs's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Post Count
    15,577
    You know we won a le in 2007 right?
    Yes, perhaps 2007 was in exchange for the traitorous sell out.

    Go back to the op and compare where we and the NBA were in Summer 2005 compared to now summer 2010.

    With a completely stacked roster going forward we got one le in 5 years while the *Champs* are a burqua hat wearing got with 21 to 5 freethrows in one quarter who got Pao Gasol for Kwame Brown. Now we just gave Bonehead/ 50 million dollars over 4 years while Matt Barnes will outproduce the two of them combined for 3.6 million total.

    The smell of rigged abounds.

  11. #36
    Robble robble your title? TheSpurglar's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Post Count
    226
    Completely disagree. Is this was true why not teach all defenders to simply hack at the shooters hand?
    We need word for word rulebook.
    Your word usage is fantastic. You "completely disagree" with something that most casual fans are aware of. And then you call teaching this legitimate rule "hacking". So I'll bite... they do teach you to "hack" at the shooter's hand if you're pursuing a layup. It's just not the easiest thing to do because, y'know, not everybody playing basketball has that much defensive skill. That's why a lot of defenders are out of position, miss the block, and hit wrist or forearm instead, at which point the whistle blows because, y'know... that's a foul.

  12. #37
    Believe. Fabbs's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Post Count
    15,577
    I can't post the rule.
    So STFU until you can.

  13. #38
    Robble robble your title? TheSpurglar's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Post Count
    226
    Now we just gave Bonehead/ 50 million dollars over 4 years while Matt Barnes will outproduce the two of them combined for 3.6 million total.
    Statistically?



    No... he won't.

  14. #39
    Robble robble your title? TheSpurglar's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Post Count
    226
    So STFU until you can.
    Will you now?

    http://www.nba.com/features/misunder...es_051128.html

    Incidental Contact:
    The mere fact that contact occurs does not mean a foul has been committed. Players are allowed to contact other players when reaching for a loose ball, or when performing normal offensive and defensive movements. The hand is considered “ part of the ball” when it is in contact with the ball and contact with a players hand when it is in contact with the ball is not a foul.

  15. #40
    Out with the old... Obstructed_View's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    41,715
    Completely disagree. Is this was true why not teach all defenders to simply hack at the shooters hand?
    We need word for word rulebook.
    Uh, Kori's post has word for word from the rulebook. If you don't know the hand is part of the ball, then my guess is that you've never played basketball in your life. Go to a basketball court at an elementary school and you'll hear the kids say that.

  16. #41
    I'm poplovin' it! TJastal's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    7,725
    LOL Fabbs... "Lewie Scola"


  17. #42
    Believe. Fabbs's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Post Count
    15,577
    Will you now?

    http://www.nba.com/features/misunder...es_051128.html

    Incidental Contact:
    The mere fact that contact occurs does not mean a foul has been committed. Players are allowed to contact other players when reaching for a loose ball, or when performing normal offensive and defensive movements. The hand is considered “ part of the ball” when it is in contact with the ball and contact with a players hand when it is in contact with the ball is not a foul.
    Notice this is under "Incidental Contact".
    While shooting?
    Gasols hack was hardly "incidental".
    I'll see what i can find.

  18. #43
    Believe. Fabbs's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Post Count
    15,577
    Originally Posted by Fabbs
    Now we just gave Bonehead/ 50 million dollars over 4 years while Matt Barnes will outproduce the two of them combined for 3.6 million total.

    Statistically?



    No... he won't.
    meh probably true that Bonner will hit enough non pressure up-by-20 YMCA regular season treys to beef up his points per game.
    Ditto Soft , he'll have the occasional 18/9 game that he is capable of doing regularly.
    Combined, their stats will outdo Barnes yeah probably.

    But for those of us who are not Boxscore Bettys we know and saw what BonBon and did in the playoffs.

  19. #44
    Out with the old... Obstructed_View's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    41,715
    Notice this is under "Incidental Contact".
    in·ci·den·tal -adj 1. happening or likely to happen in an unplanned or subordinate conjunction with something else. 3. likely to happen or naturally appertaining.

    While shooting?
    Are you somehow suggesting that someone can shoot the ball without their hand being in contact with the ball? Touching someone's hand while they're shooting the ball is considered "Incidental", so it's not a foul.

    Gasols hack was hardly "incidental".
    If it meets the criteria above, that someone was shooting, then it is by-rule "incidental contact".

    I'll see what i can find.
    Good luck. Since you can't seem to admit when you're completely wrong, I'd wager that you couldn't find your ass with both hands.

  20. #45
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,451
    Completely disagree. Is this was true why not teach all defenders to simply hack at the shooters hand?
    We need word for word rulebook.
    That is unintentionally the funniest thing Fabbs has ever posted.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •