Excellent point!! Which proves my point that Tim Duncan's production is about the same as it has always been, and the main reason for his decline in numbers is because of his decline in minutes.
If there's a big in the NBA that has per 36 numbers that are clearly better than Duncan's, I'd love to see them.
Excellent point!! Which proves my point that Tim Duncan's production is about the same as it has always been, and the main reason for his decline in numbers is because of his decline in minutes.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)