Is he a lock to even make the team?
I understand TP will probably command most of the minutes, but if he happens to go down for a bit, are you telling me you're confident a pseudo-rook like Temple can play against the likes of Nash, Rondo, CP3, etc?
We dont have a tandem we call "The Twin Tower's" but now with another legit big man to guard the basket, it will be the closest to the Tim/David era we have been. I agree with the funnel tactic failing over the last couple years, but we have upgraded our youth and athletecism, so hopefully with Tiago's addition that will change.
Is he a lock to even make the team?
I understand TP will probably command most of the minutes, but if he happens to go down for a bit, are you telling me you're confident a pseudo-rook like Temple can play against the likes of Nash, Rondo, CP3, etc?
Would love to see Garrett Temple as primary backup PG. He performed well and clearly played like he belongs during the latter part of the last season.
Hill would take over if TP were injured and then you definitely would see Temple play. Temple showed flashes last year that he, at the very least has the potential to be a solid combo guard player, with the ability to defend. The Spurs pg position is solid and is alot better depth wise than other NBA teams IMO.
I don't know why this is so difficult for people to figure out or grasp.
It's called a three-guard rotation and it's not exactly a novel concept. Hill can (and probably will) double as the starting SG and the backup PG.
Because Pop is always cognizant of managing minutes throughout the regular season, I'm sure against lesser compe ion, during blowouts and during hectic stretches in the schedule, we'll see a fourth guard playing more frequently. But when it get's right down to it, against quality - elite opposition and in the playoffs, expect to see a three-guard rotation, so as to maximize the minutes of three of the Spurs four best players.
A three-guard rotation doesn't necessarily exclude Anderson from cracking the rotation. He could still be in it as the backup SF.
If I had to guess how Pop would work the rotation, I'd say Ginobili in for Hill at the 7 minute mark, then Hill returning for Parker at the 4 minute mark, followed by Parker returning for Ginobili at the 10-9 minute mark, followed by Ginobili back in for Hill at the 6 minute mark, followed by Hill back in for Jefferson at the 4-3 minute mark.
http://ownersedge.fanball.com/player_notes/nba
According to this site which uses SAEN as a source Manu will be starting at SG and Hill will be coming off the bench..
I see the humor behind your post implying the source I got the bit of news from should be taken with a grain of salt, only thing is, the news I posted wasn't from a source other than the direct one itself, Tony.
temple is def. making the team, hes a solid backup and has some real defense in his bones
It's hard to imagine a scenario where Temple will not make this team. It would require both Neal and Penney being so potentially awesome that they supercede what Temple has already proven he can do on the NBA level.
I like Temple too, but there is no way a guy who has played 27 games with three teams can be considered a "solid backup". I hope he develops into, at very least, a solid defensive role player for the Spurs, but I stand by my original point that planning to put Hill and Parker in the starting lineup is incredibly premature.
I can understand benching Manu for Turkoglu or Finley, guys who are starting-caliber NBA players who actually produce more from a starting role, but the Spurs are just getting stupid at this point. You start your best players, and Ginobili needs to be starting.
He is a starter. If my 65 year old uncle can work 8-16 hour shifts in 110 degree weather welding and fitting huge and hot ass pipe in awkward spaces on two HORRIBLE knees for 40+ years then in my personal opinion a 33 year old Ginobili can log 30-35 minutes every other game as a starter.
Garrett Temple is our back up point guard man. Remember, he is now Pop's favorite player.
I hope that's true, but I don't believe it. Gary Neal has Anthony Tolliver II written all over him.
Read TD21's post.
There's absolutely no doubt in my mind that Temple makes this team. He may turn into their defensive stopper on the wing, in an attempt to make chicken salad at least - beats having Hill as your primary defender against legit 2s and 3s.
Also you've gotta consider cutting Temple costs the Spurs $110K and Gee costs them $100K.
Okay, I read it. It has absolutely nothing to do with who Pop's favorite player is. Now you read it and tell me what your intended point was.
Back-up point guard position.
Oh, okay. My post was saying that I hope Temple is Pop's favorite player. It'd be nice for him to like a guy who can probably play defense.
The Spurs are thin at the point guard position even if Parker starts and Hill backs him up. Trying to justify starting the two of them together borders on madness, and I'm sure Pop and those that hate to see him questioned will spend lots of time doing it if it comes to pass.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)